Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
FrankChag wrote:Woman (n), an adult female human.
Ergo, a man who dresses LIKE a woman, is still a man, and NOT a woman.
Also is a shameless man with mental dysfunctions, but that last part is my opinion.
Mosby (2009). Mosby's Pocket Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing & Health Professions - E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 1453. ISBN 978-0323066044. https://books.google.tt/books?id=_QGaoi ... &q&f=false
Dohplaydat wrote:FrankChag wrote:Woman (n), an adult female human.
Ergo, a man who dresses LIKE a woman, is still a man, and NOT a woman.
Also is a shameless man with mental dysfunctions, but that last part is my opinion.
Mosby (2009). Mosby's Pocket Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing & Health Professions - E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 1453. ISBN 978-0323066044. https://books.google.tt/books?id=_QGaoi ... &q&f=false
I think there are some legit cases out there, but the woke bandwagon is quick to jump to full trans support without thinking things through logically.
aaron17 wrote:Time to push the earth reset button
brickman wrote:It was fake news from a parody social media account that the idiot mainstream media ran with without fact checking.All done to rile up you sensitive folks.
redmanjp wrote:these days anything is possible with this movement u cant tell the difference- look how many ppl -men, women, lgbt and even trans were fooled on twitter
https://twitter.com/TransMindful/status/1616510029091471360
10 years ago u would be sure its parody- now not so much.
redmanjp wrote:these days anything is possible with this movement u cant tell the difference- look how many ppl -men, women, lgbt and even trans were fooled on twitter
https://twitter.com/TransMindful/status/1616510029091471360
10 years ago u would be sure its parody- now not so much.
MSN is an agragator of other sources' published stories. MSN AIs write stories based on other published stories.redmanjp wrote:As some ppl on Twitter said the account was updated AFTER to reflect that it was parody. Not before the post.
MSN which is more mainstream also ran it.
MSN is not a news source.redmanjp wrote:As some ppl on Twitter said the account was updated AFTER to reflect that it was parody. Not before the post.
MSN which is more mainstream also ran it.
redmanjp wrote:take 1 guess who is offended. this is a real war on women
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/aretha-franklin-song-natural-woman-deemed-offensive/ar-AA16BAz4
daring dragoon wrote:redmanjp wrote:take 1 guess who is offended. this is a real war on women
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/aretha-franklin-song-natural-woman-deemed-offensive/ar-AA16BAz4
but all kenny J christmas songs still allowed to play, all them chutney vulgar songs, all them racial songs from sugar aloes and cro cro still allowed to play an people does wonder why i say people are idiots.
daring dragoon wrote:redmanjp wrote:take 1 guess who is offended. this is a real war on women
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/aretha-franklin-song-natural-woman-deemed-offensive/ar-AA16BAz4
but all kenny J christmas songs still allowed to play, all them chutney vulgar songs, all them racial songs from sugar aloes and cro cro still allowed to play an people does wonder why i say people are idiots.
adnj wrote:daring dragoon wrote:redmanjp wrote:take 1 guess who is offended. this is a real war on women
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/other/aretha-franklin-song-natural-woman-deemed-offensive/ar-AA16BAz4
but all kenny J christmas songs still allowed to play, all them chutney vulgar songs, all them racial songs from sugar aloes and cro cro still allowed to play an people does wonder why i say people are idiots.
Sorry, slick. You're late. Read the thread. This entire thing was created as a joke.
matr1x wrote:Nobody wines hard for a chutney song than women
daring dragoon wrote:matr1x wrote:Nobody wines hard for a chutney song than women
is that the kind of women you take home to meet your mother and put in house? them is to get them head bad and hit it an quit it.
redmanjp wrote:guy couldnt get the job because he was white
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests