Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Jared Mohammed wrote:There are a percentage of women who produce more testosterone than a percentage of men. We live in a spectrum, not everything is as binary as it appears.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Both men and women have testosterone and oestrogen. Just because a woman trains, doesn't mean she is automatically injecting testosterone.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:I'm going to state something controversial here, but considering the current times, do you think most men are fit for a leadership role.
Being muscular isn't a masculine trait. What would you define as being masculine or feminine.
MY BROTHER IN CHRIST
RIDDLE ME THIS, RIDDLE ME THAT:
IF BEING MUCULAR ISN'T A MASCULINE TRAIT....
THEN WHY DO THE FEMALE BODYBUILDERS YOU MENTIONED INJECT TESTOSTERONE?
A MOLECULE WHICH MEN NATURALY PRODUCE IN VASTLY GREATER QUANTITIES TO REGULAR WOMEN.
WHY DO THEY DO THAT???
No no no, do not shift the goalpost sir.
The ones you linked clearly injecting extra Test on some level. They have to take extra testosterone, which men produce MORE of naturally.
Ik you like to link sources, so go ahead and google.
Who produces more Estrogen naturally? Males or females?
Who produces more Testosterone naturally? Males or females?
If males produce more testosterone naturally on average, that would make being muscular , an inherent masculine trait.
Please go back to Tumblr/Reddit. We don't need this 'middle-of-the-fence' mentality in today's society.
You could like being dominated by gyal who could hold you in a choke, doesn't mean society would be better if everyone had your preferences.
Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
Y'all are reapproaching the realm of discrimination. I was talking about that there are women who produce more testosterone than men.ProtonPowder wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:There are a percentage of women who produce more testosterone than a percentage of men. We live in a spectrum, not everything is as binary as it appears.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Both men and women have testosterone and oestrogen. Just because a woman trains, doesn't mean she is automatically injecting testosterone.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:I'm going to state something controversial here, but considering the current times, do you think most men are fit for a leadership role.
Being muscular isn't a masculine trait. What would you define as being masculine or feminine.
MY BROTHER IN CHRIST
RIDDLE ME THIS, RIDDLE ME THAT:
IF BEING MUCULAR ISN'T A MASCULINE TRAIT....
THEN WHY DO THE FEMALE BODYBUILDERS YOU MENTIONED INJECT TESTOSTERONE?
A MOLECULE WHICH MEN NATURALY PRODUCE IN VASTLY GREATER QUANTITIES TO REGULAR WOMEN.
WHY DO THEY DO THAT???
No no no, do not shift the goalpost sir.
The ones you linked clearly injecting extra Test on some level. They have to take extra testosterone, which men produce MORE of naturally.
Ik you like to link sources, so go ahead and google.
Who produces more Estrogen naturally? Males or females?
Who produces more Testosterone naturally? Males or females?
If males produce more testosterone naturally on average, that would make being muscular , an inherent masculine trait.
Please go back to Tumblr/Reddit. We don't need this 'middle-of-the-fence' mentality in today's society.
You could like being dominated by gyal who could hold you in a choke, doesn't mean society would be better if everyone had your preferences.
People like you would believe that every female bodybuilder have the constitution of Caster Semenya. A woman cannot have both that mass and be that lean without anabolic steroids and cutting agents.
Folks just like you, who are so desperate to seem inclusive, end up thinking that the fraction of a percent of people who exist outside of a binary system constitute legitimate exceptions. Those are what we call abominations and freaks.
Chromosomes come as XX and XY. People like you immediately talk about things like Klinefelter's disease where people have XXY as if is some significant percentage that counts for something. See above, abominations.
Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
Jared Mohammed wrote:Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
No because you, in particular, asked for it indirectly by making false accusations.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
we never ask for that padna. and it surely wasnt me in that series of posts where you went off on a tangent to volunteer all that information. i just recall you were being asked questions and when you could not answer what was being asked, you start pelting sheit on the wall to see what would stick.
i gonna ask the question again though since you dont like to answer hard questions and start pelting- were you or were you not objectifying women when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
The_Honourable wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
Says you who gazes and promotes the sexualization of females multiple times by posting oversexualized female anime characters (some suspected to be underaged?) as your tuner profile pic.
Jared Mohammed wrote:No because you, in particular, asked for it indirectly by making false accusations.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
we never ask for that padna. and it surely wasnt me in that series of posts where you went off on a tangent to volunteer all that information. i just recall you were being asked questions and when you could not answer what was being asked, you start pelting sheit on the wall to see what would stick.
i gonna ask the question again though since you dont like to answer hard questions and start pelting- were you or were you not objectifying women when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
What is wrong with y'all, like everytime I read a message on here, I feel that more persons should seek (sincerely) psychiatric help.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:No because you, in particular, asked for it indirectly by making false accusations.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
we never ask for that padna. and it surely wasnt me in that series of posts where you went off on a tangent to volunteer all that information. i just recall you were being asked questions and when you could not answer what was being asked, you start pelting sheit on the wall to see what would stick.
i gonna ask the question again though since you dont like to answer hard questions and start pelting- were you or were you not objectifying women when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
newsflash -- you were sexually objectifying women when you made the post.
dont justify it by first saying "we asked for it" THEN saying "i indirectly ask for it". no one here asked for that.
you sound like one of them men who would rape women because 'they ask for it'...
Such as.teems1 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
You should understand that you don't speak for all women.
Some women want to be objectified, and that's their right to do so.
Jared Mohammed wrote:What is wrong with y'all, like everytime I read a message on here, I feel that more persons should seek (sincerely) psychiatric help.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:No because you, in particular, asked for it indirectly by making false accusations.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Because y'all asked for that. If I remembered it was because of your false assumptions about myself that lead to said answer.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
so what did you do when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
we never ask for that padna. and it surely wasnt me in that series of posts where you went off on a tangent to volunteer all that information. i just recall you were being asked questions and when you could not answer what was being asked, you start pelting sheit on the wall to see what would stick.
i gonna ask the question again though since you dont like to answer hard questions and start pelting- were you or were you not objectifying women when u posted pictures of muscular women showing lots of skin while mentioning getting pegged by someone like them?
newsflash -- you were sexually objectifying women when you made the post.
dont justify it by first saying "we asked for it" THEN saying "i indirectly ask for it". no one here asked for that.
you sound like one of them men who would rape women because 'they ask for it'...
You are not a woman, which makes your comparison null and void. Furthermore, take a look at the comments you are making towards me.
Considering the types of statements you are making and its abundance is making me wonder about your sanity. Either that or y'all need to spend more time in reality and not stuck within your own bubbles.
I would recommend for you (and some others in here) to turn off the screen, go outside, touch some grass and re-evaluate your decisions.
I am unsure if y'all are just plain sick to even think about those scenarios or if y'all find enjoyment in continuing spouting nonsense.
aaron17 wrote:Why Jared always changing pics so?
Jared Mohammed wrote:Y'all are reapproaching the realm of discrimination. I was talking about that there are women who produce more testosterone than men.
Jared Mohammed wrote:Such as.teems1 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Women are not sexual objects designed for the male gaze. They are humans like you and I, and shouldn't have to put up with so much scrutiny by society as they already do.Ripe Chenette wrote:I like my reasonably muscled athletc women. The definition does be nice, they not flabby and the balance between firmness and softness perfect for me. And them mood balancing hormones doesnt make them as fickle as other woman. Plus they age better.88sins wrote:I personally have no idea what does attract a supposedly str8 man to an alleged woman that looks more manly than he does.
But I fail to see how them unnatural IFBB Classic physique, bursting at the seems men and women could be sexually arousing to anybody but porn addicted coomers.
You should understand that you don't speak for all women.
Some women want to be objectified, and that's their right to do so.
Jared Mohammed wrote:What is wrong with y'all, like everytime I read a message on here, I feel that more persons should seek (sincerely) psychiatric help.
You are not a woman, which makes your comparison null and void. Furthermore, take a look at the comments you are making towards me.
Considering the types of statements you are making and its abundance is making me wonder about your sanity. Either that or y'all need to spend more time in reality and not stuck within your own bubbles.
I would recommend for you (and some others in here) to turn off the screen, go outside, touch some grass and re-evaluate your decisions.
I am unsure if y'all are just plain sick to even think about those scenarios or if y'all find enjoyment in continuing spouting nonsense.[/quote][/quote]
Jared Mohammed wrote:There are a percentage of women who produce more testosterone than a percentage of men. We live in a spectrum, not everything is as binary as it appears.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Both men and women have testosterone and oestrogen. Just because a woman trains, doesn't mean she is automatically injecting testosterone.ruffneck_12 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:I'm going to state something controversial here, but considering the current times, do you think most men are fit for a leadership role.
Being muscular isn't a masculine trait. What would you define as being masculine or feminine.
MY BROTHER IN CHRIST
RIDDLE ME THIS, RIDDLE ME THAT:
IF BEING MUCULAR ISN'T A MASCULINE TRAIT....
THEN WHY DO THE FEMALE BODYBUILDERS YOU MENTIONED INJECT TESTOSTERONE?
A MOLECULE WHICH MEN NATURALY PRODUCE IN VASTLY GREATER QUANTITIES TO REGULAR WOMEN.
WHY DO THEY DO THAT???
No no no, do not shift the goalpost sir.
The ones you linked clearly injecting extra Test on some level. They have to take extra testosterone, which men produce MORE of naturally.
Ik you like to link sources, so go ahead and google.
Who produces more Estrogen naturally? Males or females?
Who produces more Testosterone naturally? Males or females?
If males produce more testosterone naturally on average, that would make being muscular , an inherent masculine trait.
Please go back to Tumblr/Reddit. We don't need this 'middle-of-the-fence' mentality in today's society.
You could like being dominated by gyal who could hold you in a choke, doesn't mean society would be better if everyone had your preferences.
ruffneck_12 wrote:fellas I just invented a time machine there
Went back in time to caveman days and saw Grog oppressing Grogina by making her stay at home to pick berries while they got to go out to hunt the mammoth.
I noticed that Grog was more muscular than Grogina for some reason. He is probably strong from oppressing her all day and injecting extra Testosterone because males and females produce it in equal amounts apparently, so men need to inject extra in order to build muscle.
I handed out some pamphlets highlighting the GenderMammothHunting gap but they could not read it.
However the Females agreed that Grogina should earn as much shiney rocks as Grog even though Grogina never has to run down berries for days on end to tire them out then risk death to pick berries.
Y'all sure are some keyboard warriors. Can make wild accusations without showing your faces.st7 wrote:https://sexoffenders.gov.tt/Offenders
watch this space in the coming years for jaredgpt
Well, there are more LGBTQ+ persons out there. Some would still be in the closet due to the still rampant discrimination that is present within our society.ProtonPowder wrote:Jared is one of them people that believe every woman is a GBV victim and half of society is LGBTQ+.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Habit7, shake d livin wake d dead and 146 guests