Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
ruffneck_12 wrote:I know we all went through an edgy phase where we were athiest/agnostic and making fun of religious fanatics an ting. But we honestly have to admit that religion used to keep people in line at least. There's a sweet spot, and we overshot that long ago.
ruffneck_12 wrote:
I know we all went through an edgy phase where we were athiest/agnostic and making fun of religious fanatics an ting
But we honestly have to admit that religion used to keep people in line at least.
There's a sweet spot, and we overshot that long ago.
bluefete wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/target-makes-changes-lgbtq-merchandise-222411420.html
Target pulls some LGBTQ merchandise from stores ahead of Pride month after threats to workers
ANNE D'INNOCENZIO
Tue, May 23, 2023 at 6:24 PM AST
NEW YORK (AP) — Target declined to say which items it was removing but among the ones that garnered the most attention were “tuck friendly” women’s swimsuits that allow trans women who have not had gender-affirming operations to conceal their private parts. Designs by Abprallen, a London-based company that designs and sells occult- and satanic-themed LGBTQ clothing and accessories, have also created backlash.
Target’s Pride month collection has also been the subject of several misleading videos in recent weeks, with social media users falsely claiming the retailer is selling “tuck-friendly” bathing suits designed for kids or in kids’ sizes.
Numb3r4 wrote:What I don't get is why threaten the workers???
Just organize yourselves and boycott, use the market to influence the market.
I can't figure out this NEED to be so physical and dare I say violent, why do we need this level of outward expression?
Are we a society regressing or is it a case of misplaced frustration at something we can't control?
Like the inability to adapt or control our lives?
I find (my personal observation) that folks these days are on a hair string trigger, you have to be so careful don't want to risk escalating anything.
maj. tom wrote:What's with the actual one-sided extremely biased mostly bullshiet fear-mongering campaign this thread has turned into once again?
Nothing better to do? Someone trans in your life actively bothering and harassing you or your kids? The church pastor need more money? Scroll back up and read what Phone Surgeon said.
maj. tom wrote:Ah yes, the default old "won't somebody think about the children" pearl clutching stance!
Works for basically any and everything. Because won't somebody pleaseeee think about the children! Or else you're a pedophile! Right?
Read over what Phone Surgeon has said in this thread.
maj. tom wrote:What's with the actual one-sided extremely biased mostly bullshiet fear-mongering campaign this thread has turned into once again?
Nothing better to do? Someone trans in your life actively bothering and harassing you or your kids? The church pastor need more money? Scroll back up and read what Phone Surgeon said.
Phone Surgeon wrote:Idk na...I feel this new thing where they letting kids know it's okay to be gay is so they know they have a community that supports them and they don't have to hide it or kill themselves or cut/harm themselves
I'm sure everyone have friends who marriage break up after years because the husband or wife decide or realize they gay/ lesbian and they were hiding it and went through marriage because of fear of ridicule/harassment.
Phone Surgeon wrote:Idk na...I feel this new thing where they letting kids know it's okay to be gay is so they know they have a community that supports them and they don't have to hide it or kill themselves or cut/harm themselves
I'm sure everyone have friends who marriage break up after years because the husband or wife decide or realize they gay/ lesbian and they were hiding it and went through marriage because of fear of ridicule/harassment.
Phone Surgeon wrote:I feel it have more abuse from straight people towards children than from gays
alfa wrote:The same people asking scarstically if someone trans is actively bothering you or your kids are the same ones who will throw a hissy fit should you mention abortion which ironically also isn't affecting them or their kids. Sigh....
maj. tom wrote:alfa wrote:The same people asking scarstically if someone trans is actively bothering you or your kids are the same ones who will throw a hissy fit should you mention abortion which ironically also isn't affecting them or their kids. Sigh....
To clear something up here, I support women's rights to choose what they want for their own bodies, seeing how I don't have a womb. That's their own business and I honestly thought that was the general consensus of most men on Trinituner. This is the definition of hissy fit in your "I Only Watch shiity videos from a mollusc brain ben shapiro so it makes sense to me too" worldview? Like... this analogy you mentioned above really making sense to you doesn't it?
As opposed to the side who don't have a womb and want to control the autonomy of women? The ones who want to force women to deliver miscarriages and violent rapes and make them suffer and don't want to give them access to necessary medical care just for being a woman because they need to be punished for having sex? You sure that's not the hissy fit side really?
Won't SOMEBODY think about the unborn fetus children?!
Phone Surgeon wrote:i also support pro choice . only the person who pregnant should have that decision . not even the husband/child father should be able weigh in on that if the pregnant woman decide she dont want the child for whatever reason
and definitely not outsiders/politicians
alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:alfa wrote:The same people asking scarstically if someone trans is actively bothering you or your kids are the same ones who will throw a hissy fit should you mention abortion which ironically also isn't affecting them or their kids. Sigh....
To clear something up here, I support women's rights to choose what they want for their own bodies, seeing how I don't have a womb. That's their own business and I honestly thought that was the general consensus of most men on Trinituner. This is the definition of hissy fit in your "I Only Watch shiity videos from a mollusc brain ben shapiro so it makes sense to me too" worldview? Like... this analogy you mentioned above really making sense to you doesn't it?
As opposed to the side who don't have a womb and want to control the autonomy of women? The ones who want to force women to deliver miscarriages and violent rapes and make them suffer and don't want to give them access to necessary medical care just for being a woman because they need to be punished for having sex? You sure that's not the hissy fit side really?
Won't SOMEBODY think about the unborn fetus children?!
No need for another hissy fit to justify hypocrisy. And I'm crushing on Candace Owens more these days just so you know, not just Ben Shapiro
Well a risk of jamming is the girl getting pregnant eh. Can't want the sweetness and not accept the risk of the sours. It have a whole vasectomy thread you can check out.Dizzy28 wrote:Phone Surgeon wrote:i also support pro choice . only the person who pregnant should have that decision . not even the husband/child father should be able weigh in on that if the pregnant woman decide she dont want the child for whatever reason
and definitely not outsiders/politicians
Yes the person who can potentially face jail after the child is born if he doesn't pay maintenance shouldn't have any say before the child is born.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 74 guests