Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Phone Surgeon wrote:no way pnm could get 5% in a nonbiased poll
NTA/PEP/UNC is all the same type of people
NTA and PEP supporters are people who get fedup of the UNC
PNM supporters will always be PNM supporters no matter how bad it is
Rovin wrote:who they asked about 25 ppl alot of who are GG's & PEA's frens ? ...
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:This has been sharing around on social media.
NTA 35%
UNC 30%
PEP 25%
PNM 5%
Not voting 5%
IMG_2865.jpeg
Could be a case of who is asking and who they are asking.
VexXx Dogg wrote:Polls can be accurate if they used proper statistical sampling.
A 'random poll' without any theoretical/methdological underpinning is about as useful as a two-holed condom
NTA 35%
UNC 30%
PEP 25%
PNM 5%
Not voting 5%
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:So somebody going to create an "official local elections thread or not "?
Or just rename this one
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:This has been sharing around on social media.
NTA 35%
UNC 30%
PEP 25%
PNM 5%
Not voting 5%
IMG_2865.jpeg
Could be a case of who is asking and who they are asking.
Phone Surgeon wrote:no way pnm could get 5% in a nonbiased poll
NTA/PEP/UNC is all the same type of people
NTA and PEP supporters are people who get fedup of the UNC
PNM supporters will always be PNM supporters no matter how bad it is
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], ProtonPowder and 149 guests