Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
The actual risk is 0.05% -- one person has a 50/50 chance.eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
The 3%. Repost.st7 wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
1 life for 1000... sure. his life is 3% according to his POV to human lives and covid.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
eitech wrote:adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
Look take win nah. I have my reasons putting it the way I did and allyuh never fail to disappoint in your replies
IMG_0614.JPG
st7 wrote:eitech wrote:adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
Look take win nah. I have my reasons putting it the way I did and allyuh never fail to disappoint in your replies
IMG_0614.JPG
i'm confused. you had agendas for purposely stating what u did just to be told logically why 500/1000 is not rare etc?
i think it's the context you're missing... maybe you should have said "rare life changing adverse effects" so we could have known how you meant rare. i could be wrong about what you were trying to do.
st7 wrote:eitech wrote:adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
Look take win nah. I have my reasons putting it the way I did and allyuh never fail to disappoint in your replies
IMG_0614.JPG
i'm confused. you had agendas for purposely stating what u did just to be told logically why 500/1000 is not rare etc?
i think it's the context you're missing... maybe you should have said "rare life changing adverse effects" so we could have known how you meant rare. i could be wrong about what you were trying to do.
adnj wrote:st7 wrote:eitech wrote:adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
Look take win nah. I have my reasons putting it the way I did and allyuh never fail to disappoint in your replies
IMG_0614.JPG
i'm confused. you had agendas for purposely stating what u did just to be told logically why 500/1000 is not rare etc?
i think it's the context you're missing... maybe you should have said "rare life changing adverse effects" so we could have known how you meant rare. i could be wrong about what you were trying to do.
ET was simply attempting to ask, "If half of those suffered side affects that are characterized as rare, would it be worth it?"
Unfortunately, we can't get to that point because his information bias got thebest of him and he actually stated an induction fallacy instead.
eitech wrote:adnj wrote:You said 500 of 1000. That is not a regurgitation. That is a purposeful corruption of what was said. It falls under the auspices of obfuscation.eitech wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:eitech wrote:PariaMan wrote:If Hover was to get covid and die and as a result 1000 sntivaxxers took the vaccine and 30 people who would have died survive and 300 are not hospitalized
Would that be a worthy sacrifice?
Or to be fair in the discussion, 500 of those ppl experience rare life changing adverse effects… would the sacrifice then be worth it?
How is it rare if half the people get adverse effects?
I’m only regurgitating allyuh statistical words by using rare?
Look take win nah. I have my reasons putting it the way I did and allyuh never fail to disappoint in your replies
eitech wrote:How do you know for a fact that those results are true and not skewed to give a certain view? The same question can be put to me as to why it is not. I get that. But I want to get your opinion. You believe the experts have no reason to falsify reports?
ruffneck_12 wrote:They published who was vaxed/unvaxed from who died
But they will never publish the BMI of who died.
"oh they were healthy individuals"
Keep in mind that the media would term 'healthy' as being a person who ain't bed ridden.
The average trinidadian cannot even run up a flight of stairs, far less to fight off simple illnesses.
Being fit and healthy gives you a much better fighting chance at fighting off the illness but people rather drink soft drink and sit around all day.
This pandemic would be over MUCH sooner if the world was healthier.
And no, you don't need to be rich to eat healthy/exercise.
eitech wrote:Hm i wonder what is the precedence they planning to “FORCE” upon the permanent employees at point lisas plants. I know contractors must be fully vaxxed.
ruffneck_12 wrote:They published who was vaxed/unvaxed from who died
But they will never publish the BMI of who died.
"oh they were healthy individuals"
Keep in mind that the media would term 'healthy' as being a person who ain't bed ridden.
The average trinidadian cannot even run up a flight of stairs, far less to fight off simple illnesses.
Being fit and healthy gives you a much better fighting chance at fighting off the illness but people rather drink soft drink and sit around all day.
This pandemic would be over MUCH sooner if the world was healthier.
And no, you don't need to be rich to eat healthy/exercise.
This is the body type of the average trinidadian.
Not a full blown buboloops, but still aint the picture of health and athleticism.
hover11 wrote:Minister: Christians don’t want to vaccinate
https://guardian.co.tt/news/minister-ch ... 5a55a2cdf2
Guess yall gonna hate Christians now
My question is this what they doing with the data to subjugate a particular religion to persecution or scorn?eitech wrote:hover11 wrote:Minister: Christians don’t want to vaccinate
https://guardian.co.tt/news/minister-ch ... 5a55a2cdf2
Guess yall gonna hate Christians now
Now they may very well be right or wrong eh. Yuh would think that hi calibre of medical experts should be able to produce actual factual data as opposed to irresponsible remarks. Politicians are the experts. Don’t question their expertise.
And who is she? Can I go to her if I'm suspected of having covid? What about constitutional matters and government overreach. Is she a free thinker? Does she present fact or opinion? Hoover tell us....hover11 wrote:Had it been mandatory quarantine for all regardless of vaccination status, that would have been a whole scene. The vaxxed ppl would have frothed at the mouths questioning why they even bothered
eitech wrote:hover11 wrote:Minister: Christians don’t want to vaccinate
https://guardian.co.tt/news/minister-ch ... 5a55a2cdf2
Guess yall gonna hate Christians now
Now they may very well be right or wrong eh. Yuh would think that hi calibre of medical experts should be able to produce actual factual data as opposed to irresponsible remarks. Politicians are the experts. Don’t question their expertise.
hover11 wrote:Had it been mandatory quarantine for all regardless of vaccination status, that would have been a whole scene. The vaxxed ppl would have frothed at the mouths questioning why they even bothered FB_IMG_1632399545863.jpg
adnj wrote:eitech wrote:hover11 wrote:Minister: Christians don’t want to vaccinate
https://guardian.co.tt/news/minister-ch ... 5a55a2cdf2
Guess yall gonna hate Christians now
Now they may very well be right or wrong eh. Yuh would think that hi calibre of medical experts should be able to produce actual factual data as opposed to irresponsible remarks. Politicians are the experts. Don’t question their expertise.
You consistently go from fact to personal gripe in every statement you post. So I will do the same.
Fact: MoH collects religious affiliation for some people that have received a COVID vaccination.
Fact: Nearly two-thirds of TTO self-reports as Christian.
Gripe: --
ruffneck_12 wrote:They published who was vaxed/unvaxed from who died
But they will never publish the BMI of who died.
"oh they were healthy individuals"
Keep in mind that the media would term 'healthy' as being a person who ain't bed ridden.
The average trinidadian cannot even run up a flight of stairs, far less to fight off simple illnesses.
Being fit and healthy gives you a much better fighting chance at fighting off the illness but people rather drink soft drink and sit around all day.
This pandemic would be over MUCH sooner if the world was healthier.
And no, you don't need to be rich to eat healthy/exercise.
This is the body type of the average trinidadian.
Not a full blown buboloops, but still aint the picture of health and athleticism.
eitech wrote:hover11 wrote:Minister: Christians don’t want to vaccinate
https://guardian.co.tt/news/minister-ch ... 5a55a2cdf2
Guess yall gonna hate Christians now
Now they may very well be right or wrong eh. Yuh would think that hi calibre of medical experts should be able to produce actual factual data as opposed to irresponsible remarks. Politicians are the experts. Don’t question their expertise.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests