Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
brams112 wrote:Redman wrote:What is frustrating to me...is that the GORTT is yet to confront WK s assertions head on...each side refuting the other in carefully managed press conferences and therefore clouding the issues....
The GORTT should set a PUBLIC forum,and bring both sides to present their side....and arbitrate the matter once and for all and in full view of the public.
Im all for the highway, but I also believe that it should not be done in an hamfisted manner-where a little more effort might make a big difference to the ecologically sensitive areas..
Its a RE ROUTE movement-not a anti highway movement.
Both sides seem to have an agenda.
Pal people getting paid to prevent,to make sure the highway goes where certain people bought lands just to make a killing and so on,the amount of times it was realigned most folks don't know.Where do you live and commute?because at any given time there could be gridlocked traffic going point from all roads,don't even mention when the gulf starts to get on bad,so you got to listen to who living in the area,have titles to their land and those who experience the traffic.Yesterday I was going towards the creek,when I reached paria suites there was a pile up,ended up passing through woodland,because I did not want to be caught in salt water spray.Plus most of the protesters are squatters eh.
UML wrote:Anyone know which part of Mon Desir the red/white boy that protesting from?![]()
Ah setta damn ppl who doh even pass the lighthouse. Steups.
Redman wrote:What is frustrating to me...is that the GORTT is yet to confront WK s assertions head on...each side refuting the other in carefully managed press conferences and therefore clouding the issues....
The GORTT should set a PUBLIC forum,and bring both sides to present their side....and arbitrate the matter once and for all and in full view of the public.
Im all for the highway, but I also believe that it should not be done in an hamfisted manner-where a little more effort might make a big difference to the ecologically sensitive areas..
Its a RE ROUTE movement-not a anti highway movement.
Bth sdes seem to ave an agenda.
Redman wrote:if it was easy for this government to prove him wrong they would have.
BOTH sides have an agenda-that has nothing to do with the truth
brams112 wrote:Redman wrote:if it was easy for this government to prove him wrong they would have.
BOTH sides have an agenda-that has nothing to do with the truth
You still did not answer my question,but quoted me,do you live or travel to go to point at any time?
Kublalsingh is a fool and my money comment is true eh.
16 cycles wrote:Cant encourage ppl converging around offices of strategic importance to country.
Hunger strike at home.
Redman wrote:brams112 wrote:Redman wrote:if it was easy for this government to prove him wrong they would have.
BOTH sides have an agenda-that has nothing to do with the truth
You still did not answer my question,but quoted me,do you live or travel to go to point at any time?
Kublalsingh is a fool and my money comment is true eh.
Since you insist.
I Lived in Point Fortin for 25 years...went to school in Sando while living in Point,SPENT 5 years Sando POS commute
Live in Palmiste work in Sando, with runs to Chag and POS...
If you can find anything wrong with what I posted I'm interested to hear.
I don't see what relevance where I live has...that is the type of insular myopic attitude that empowers the sycophant.
abbow wrote:i live 4 houses away from where the Grant trace intersection will be built...
abbow wrote:while i am for the highway....the question really remains.....how much is it goin to help the traffic situation? i drive from south to st clair 5 days a week...and doing that for the last 12 years...
i leave home at 4 am...get to work around 5 am to avoid all the traffic and the crap driving that we get sometimes on a morning..if i were to leave home 5 am....different story...
bamboo lights, gulf lights and macko traffic is to blame for the traffic heading into Sando after 6 am...
most of the traffic i encounter is on the hw from gasparillo onwards....so does this mean that we gonna get out of south faster and meet the same traffic on the hw that we do now? really, it doesnt mean because we have the hw in south now..that the amount of commuters heading into pos will be less....it means they can leave home a little late and with everyone doing the same...same traffic to POS
i live 4 houses away from where the Grant trace intersection will be built, so i await to see the difference it really makes for me having to go st clair every day...
SENSE. One result is going to be the backup on the northbound moving south.abbow wrote:i leave home at 4 am...get to work around 5 am to avoid all the traffic and the crap driving that we get sometimes on a morning..if i were to leave home 5 am....different story...
bamboo lights, gulf lights and macko traffic is to blame for the traffic heading into Sando after 6 am...
most of the traffic i encounter is on the hw from gasparillo onwards....so does this mean that we gonna get out of south faster and meet the same traffic on the hw that we do now? really, it doesnt mean because we have the hw in south now..that the amount of commuters heading into pos will be less....it means they can leave home a little late and with everyone doing the same...same traffic to POS
Redman wrote:You really have nothing to say except to bad talk Kublalsingh.
You understand the word re route?
It's not a don't build the highway movement It's a re route movement.
Which implies that the GORTT may not be executing a great idea properly.
Which may cost all of us in the future.
If the government were able to refute his claims....they would have...and it would have made it into the papers.
They have not....so regardless where I live,whether Kublalsingh is making money or not the GORTT has a responsibility to address all our concerns ...which they have not full filled.
If he is such a krunt. Why can't the GORTT deal with him properly??
Prove him wrong THEN, Build the hway
What are your views on the Armstrong report?
The recommendations were mainly based on the fact that the GORTT did not follow best practices.
Yet the GORTT ignored the reccs even though the GORTT established the committee and it's terms of reference.
Your views are entirely wrong...you musbe from POS![]()
Just point out where I have stated implicitly or explicitly that I'm against the hway.
UML wrote:Redman wrote:You really have nothing to say except to bad talk Kublalsingh.
You understand the word re route?
It's not a don't build the highway movement It's a re route movement.
Which implies that the GORTT may not be executing a great idea properly.
Which may cost all of us in the future.
If the government were able to refute his claims....they would have...and it would have made it into the papers.
They have not....so regardless where I live,whether Kublalsingh is making money or not the GORTT has a responsibility to address all our concerns ...which they have not full filled.
If he is such a krunt. Why can't the GORTT deal with him properly??
Prove him wrong THEN, Build the hway
What are your views on the Armstrong report?
The recommendations were mainly based on the fact that the GORTT did not follow best practices.
Yet the GORTT ignored the reccs even though the GORTT established the committee and it's terms of reference.
Your views are entirely wrong...you musbe from POS![]()
Just point out where I have stated implicitly or explicitly that I'm against the hway.
The re routed path crosses and destroys more mangrove and directs highway traffic to an already congested and flooded Mosquito Creek!
Yuh ever see a highway with a 90 degree bend? Yuh want we road fatality figures to be even higher?
Contracts already signed penalties being applied for breach and deadlines not being met additional cost in delays etc
Yuh so accustomed to cost overruns under the pnm yuh feel yuh missing something
Redman wrote:Can you validate your claim??UML wrote:The re routed path crosses and destroys more mangrove and directs highway traffic to an already congested and flooded Mosquito Creek!
Yuh ever see a highway with a 90 degree bend? Yuh want we road fatality figures to be even higher?
The Grand Bazaar turn is what?
Sando tech is what degree turn?
The Golconda turn to Sando is what?
Every off ramp and on ramp on the UBH highway is 90 degrees.
Redman wrote:UML wrote:Redman wrote:You really have nothing to say except to bad talk Kublalsingh.
You understand the word re route?
It's not a don't build the highway movement It's a re route movement.
Which implies that the GORTT may not be executing a great idea properly.
Which may cost all of us in the future.
If the government were able to refute his claims....they would have...and it would have made it into the papers.
They have not....so regardless where I live,whether Kublalsingh is making money or not the GORTT has a responsibility to address all our concerns ...which they have not full filled.
If he is such a krunt. Why can't the GORTT deal with him properly??
Prove him wrong THEN, Build the hway
What are your views on the Armstrong report?
The recommendations were mainly based on the fact that the GORTT did not follow best practices.
Yet the GORTT ignored the reccs even though the GORTT established the committee and it's terms of reference.
Your views are entirely wrong...you musbe from POS![]()
Just point out where I have stated implicitly or explicitly that I'm against the hway.
The re routed path crosses and destroys more mangrove and directs highway traffic to an already congested and flooded Mosquito Creek!
Yuh ever see a highway with a 90 degree bend? Yuh want we road fatality figures to be even higher?
Contracts already signed penalties being applied for breach and deadlines not being met additional cost in delays etc
Yuh so accustomed to cost overruns under the pnm yuh feel yuh missing something
Can you validate your claim??
The Grand Bazaar turn is what?
Sando tech is what degree turn?
The Golconda turn to Sando is what?
Every off ramp and on ramp on the UBH highway is 90 degrees.
Again-and to be clear -the GORTT should be able to PROVE to us the decisions are based on solid data and correct protocols....
The GORTT should have come out and clearly demonstrated that WK s claims are wrong...
Having done that they could have been way ahead of where we are now-with 100% support from the population.
Why havent they-the AG throws press conferences at the drop of a dime...en he has an iota of edence that he right...
They haven-which means they cant...
What if the man is right and there IS a better way to do this???
abbow wrote:while i am for the highway....the question really remains.....how much is it goin to help the traffic situation? i drive from south to st clair 5 days a week...and doing that for the last 12 years...
i leave home at 4 am...get to work around 5 am to avoid all the traffic and the crap driving that we get sometimes on a morning..if i were to leave home 5 am....different story...
bamboo lights, gulf lights and macko traffic is to blame for the traffic heading into Sando after 6 am...
most of the traffic i encounter is on the hw from gasparillo onwards....so does this mean that we gonna get out of south faster and meet the same traffic on the hw that we do now? really, it doesnt mean because we have the hw in south now..that the amount of commuters heading into pos will be less....it means they can leave home a little late and with everyone doing the same...same traffic to POS
i live 4 houses away from where the Grant trace intersection will be built, so i await to see the difference it really makes for me having to go st clair every day...
he spoke of the commute on the highway, you know the access to the developed area from the rural area.UML wrote:The reason for the highway is to develop the rural areas and to make access to the developed from the rural areas easier.abbow wrote:most of the traffic i encounter is on the hw from gasparillo onwards....so does this mean that we gonna get out of south faster and meet the same traffic on the hw that we do now? really, it doesnt mean because we have the hw in south now..that the amount of commuters heading into pos will be less....it means they can leave home a little late and with everyone doing the same...same traffic to POS
i live 4 houses away from where the Grant trace intersection will be built, so i await to see the difference it really makes for me having to go st clair every day...
How d ass cud u expect a highway in south make traffic in pos better?
U really hadda be from the country!
But doh worry the highway go fix dat...it go make yuh bright!
abbow wrote:calor:
look at the OAS video, at 2.12 in the video...all those houses on the left are my relatives....to the top left corner of the screen at 2:13 is where the flyover/interchange will be. exactly how it is there in the vid is how it is now....they continued work further onwards to pt fortin.
actually this weekend 3 of my relatives homes are scheduled to be demolished......
again...alot of people for the hw, including myself....but when people have prior knowledge of where the hw will pass in the debe to mon desir section, runs off and purchase land and property there....so when hw pass through, they get the opportunity to rape the treasury......fcukery.
We all work hard and pay our taxes...not for any government to give away to friends and family...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests