Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:meccalli wrote:I don't see a problem, we couldn't even be in possession of a phone unless your parents made arrangements or something and that's just 6 years ago. Guys hid their phones in their shoes, pants and the wall sometimes. One dean would randomly walk around with bluetooth to find guys. The one time i carried an actual camera to school nearing the end of my time in hillview, it got seized and I had to get a letter to have it returned to me.hydroep wrote:I guess it's for the same reason we weren't allowed to bring video games, radios, toys etc. It's a distraction - or in the case of this alleged boolaman scene causes students to create distractions.
The only valid reason to have phones during school hours is to contact your parents/guardians in case of emergency and that can be done via the main office or pay phone (if those still exist) when required.
I agree, phones are a distraction in class. However the Minister's reason is not for the distraction but rather to prevent these videos from reaching the public, that is what many citizens have a problem with.
Redman wrote:I agree.
Any thing we don't want we ban.
Cuz thus far banning stuff works.
Like cigarettes
Porn
Drugs
Sex.
Teachers leaving early.
Smh...he seems to live on another planet
What's the point of adding another item to a list of things they already not enforcing existing bans on.?
This is what happens when you don't have a POLICY...
Ben_spanna wrote:This man is setting Trinidad back again with regards to Education............. sigh! no wonder we will stay a third world country
Joshie23 wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:This man is setting Trinidad back again with regards to Education............. sigh! no wonder we will stay a third world country
Can you elaborate on that statement? As archaic as the concept is, how exactly does banning camera phones have a regressive impact on education? Are we disrupting some some videography classes or is this yet another statement awash with politics?
Gladiator wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:This man is setting Trinidad back again with regards to Education............. sigh! no wonder we will stay a third world country
Can you elaborate on that statement? As archaic as the concept is, how exactly does banning camera phones have a regressive impact on education? Are we disrupting some some videography classes or is this yet another statement awash with politics?
The MOE building an APP to anonymously report bullying or other issues in schools, or an App to communicate to students when there is no school or unexpected closure, or an app to distribute exam results and time tables etc would be a more progressive in today's world.... to bad we have dinosaurs in Govt.
Joshie23 wrote:Gladiator wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Ben_spanna wrote:This man is setting Trinidad back again with regards to Education............. sigh! no wonder we will stay a third world country
Can you elaborate on that statement? As archaic as the concept is, how exactly does banning camera phones have a regressive impact on education? Are we disrupting some some videography classes or is this yet another statement awash with politics?
The MOE building an APP to anonymously report bullying or other issues in schools, or an App to communicate to students when there is no school or unexpected closure, or an app to distribute exam results and time tables etc would be a more progressive in today's world.... to bad we have dinosaurs in Govt.
Thank you for your constructive response and I fully agree. We're in a technological era, whereby information can be disseminated just by clicking your screen, so I totally stand by that statement, but to twist everything for political or racial pips, it's getting old.
Ben_spanna wrote:This man is setting Trinidad back again with regards to Education............. sigh! no wonder we will stay a third world country
Redman wrote:Where is the data to say that the phones CONTRIBUTE to the issues of fighting etc?
Usage IN class is not relevant.
meccalli wrote:Sure, blame the schools, teachers and ministry- they're clearly the ones responsible for the behaviour of students.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests