Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rovin wrote:rubbish ole talk , at d time ppl were fed up of d BS & wastage manning was doing ....
mero wrote:PNM funding Netflix and CA now?
Rowley even more evil than I thought
VexXx Dogg wrote:Well no.
UNC supposedly paid for a service.
CA was supposedly analyzing the fb/cso dataset and making recommendations/strategy decisions to woo electorate to the party.
CA didn't fund the campaign.
maj. tom wrote:If it were the other way around, would you have said the same thing?
I don't think so. And the statements made in that clip are accurate and are pretty much how the outside wider world view third world politics.
This is pretty much how the last US election went down as well. They hire companies to illegally mine personal data and then spread a message mostly through social media platforms to influence voters. He mentioned several other countries where they used the data to influence voting, including the Brexit mess! Be sure that the 2015 election was won by the PNM the same way, influencing and convincing voters of how bad Kamla was from the false emailgate to the endless hysteria of how the treasury empty through corruption. By September 2015 everyone was so convinced of how evil the UNC was for the country. And the next election will be the same thing. This is how the world works now. There are no laws against this sort of thing yet.
The Cambridge Analytica scandal should push all countries of the world to protect their citizens data, and by extension privacy and rights further to adapt to the future world of the internet. And apply a UN resolution regarding global rules on how data is accessed. You have to understand that the internet is a very new technology and the first time in history that humanity is accessing information on this level and speed. Our generation is now starting to open up the can of worms on the ways it will be abused. Just like how in the 1950s that generation faced a new world of nuclear testing and a secure energy future dream that had to be checked by a UN resolution when they realized how it was really damaging the planet.
MG Man wrote:I kinda sorta disagree.....Trump won because the reality is nobody wanted Hilary so the dems didn't vote....had it been Berine, russia or no russia, dems woulda came out en masse and voted
Same wid 'do so'....Percy Villafana bracing Manning was a turning point and basically cemented public dissent against Patos....Kamliar and Gang were smart to capitalize on it
Slartibartfast wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Well no.
CA gathered individual citizen data without their consent
SMc wrote:Slartibartfast wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Well no.
CA gathered individual citizen data without their consent
Disagree there- once you sign up for any social media platform you agree to share your information with them-check the T&C's-
Ben_spanna wrote:if this smoke screen deters you from the reality of whats going on right here in your own Trinidad then youre too fvking stupid to even think or contribute to our society.
pete wrote:MG Man wrote:I kinda sorta disagree.....Trump won because the reality is nobody wanted Hilary so the dems didn't vote....had it been Berine, russia or no russia, dems woulda came out en masse and voted
Same wid 'do so'....Percy Villafana bracing Manning was a turning point and basically cemented public dissent against Patos....Kamliar and Gang were smart to capitalize on it
Yeah, they were. However, a few years later, the current ruling party laid fabricated emails in Parliament to steal the 2015 elections. Which is infinitely more sinister.
assassin wrote:Internationally the CA scandal was that they used people's FB data without explicit consent. If I clicked "ok" and participated in a FB quiz from CA, they accessed my friends' prelim data without the consent of my friends
The firm was deemed unethical in its data gathering.
Did CA's clients know of the firm's unethical practices and were complicit?
Did clients hire CA based on the firm's ability to gather data and conduct research based on such data?
This manipulation of the masses is an established science and has been going on for over a century. It started with Freud and was commercialized by Bernays. It was the genesis of "public relations "
the Cambridge Analytica campaign that was devised and successfully deployed in Trinidad and Tobago to alter the youth vote and ultimately influence an election result. Towards the end, we hear about other countries where campaigns are active, as well as a suggestion of involvement in Brexit.
maj. tom wrote:like most people that jump in this thread missing the whole point of the CA issue and focusing on the politics. Typical Trini-3rd world view.the Cambridge Analytica campaign that was devised and successfully deployed in Trinidad and Tobago to alter the youth vote and ultimately influence an election result. Towards the end, we hear about other countries where campaigns are active, as well as a suggestion of involvement in Brexit.
The issue is that CA invaded internet privacy and illegally used the data to influence votes through media on various platforms. Not that an election was called, or that the results would have been the same. It's that this is the new method of influencing people to make decisions. They cited Brexit also, how they were able to convince UK general population how to vote through media campaigns using their data to target the psychological direction of people's mind. Also known as subliminal advertising. Also known as subtle brainwashing.
If you do some blasted research you would see that this theory of directing people's thoughts and actions came about just after WWII when the US government hired one Edward Bernays to influence the direction for modern society so we could never fall into such a brutal and primal conflict again. His method has been used in advertising ever since, a notable success was the Tobacco and Sugar industries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Be ... c_approach
The CA issue is the modern approach where they are mining ALL of your data on the internet, all your habits, all your clicks, and then custom tailoring products and ideas just for you to make a decision that will be biased toward the topic they are advertising, i.e., hired by political parties to influence your thinking. This is how the PNM also worked in 2015 to create the hysteria of mistrust and corruption against the UNC to get the people to vote them out. Ads stimulating your brain, newspaper articles you are reading online, even items you purchased, you were bombarded and reminded of how the UNC was bad. Trinidad and Tobago 2010 election was just a case study cited in that clip in the documentary.
WTF it's like some of allyuh can't read and understand the issue.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: death365, Dohplaydat, Google [Bot] and 177 guests