Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
They never won, all their elections was never free and fair.aaron17 wrote:How many times pnm won consecutively?
Bas the is not the problem, PNM is.screwbash wrote:thats insulting mr panday. you are the same man that tell supporters to ' put the x by the balizea' and vote you out of office, you are the same man that gone in some hindu function and greet them muslim greeting, you are the same one that father and daughter drunk in a bar on sutton street. you go listen to you pa?
Redman wrote:Neutrality at its finest.
The PNM will win for the same reason Trump probably will.
No competition.
The problem remains that there is no cohesive alternative.
So the PNM can do what it wants.
Who fault is that.
The problem is you vote PNMRedman wrote:Neutrality at its finest.
The PNM will win for the same reason Trump probably will.
No competition.
The problem remains that there is no cohesive alternative.
So the PNM can do what it wants.
Who fault is that.
matr1x wrote:The problem is the UNC lacks vigor. And energy. That says alot of the base and voting population. This whole ganges meets the Nile nonsense tried to mentally make people guilty of feeling there was a race divide. But sugar aloes freely sang the true feelings of the pnm base.
The whole not wanting to appear bad while the pnm clearly stated their stance on how they felt about the indo population should have been the wakeup call.
But parents wanting to keep up some kinda of facade shielding their kids from the fact that the pnm does not see a future that includes an indo population in that vision. And there is where the truth hits them when they socialize and it messes them up.
Point is, the pnm serves the 1%, and their policies will go to that end. So it's either the UNC stop playing the bipartisanship game and fight the war that should have been done 24 years ago....or get lost in history
Indos will just do as they have always done, education and migration.D Diesel Report wrote:matr1x wrote:The problem is the UNC lacks vigor. And energy. That says alot of the base and voting population. This whole ganges meets the Nile nonsense tried to mentally make people guilty of feeling there was a race divide. But sugar aloes freely sang the true feelings of the pnm base.
The whole not wanting to appear bad while the pnm clearly stated their stance on how they felt about the indo population should have been the wakeup call.
But parents wanting to keep up some kinda of facade shielding their kids from the fact that the pnm does not see a future that includes an indo population in that vision. And there is where the truth hits them when they socialize and it messes them up.
Point is, the pnm serves the 1%, and their policies will go to that end. So it's either the UNC stop playing the bipartisanship game and fight the war that should have been done 24 years ago....or get lost in history
Buh wha d PNM really think gonna happen to indos in the long run? And wha sugar aloes sing exactly to create dat sentiment?
PNM ppl gained the most under non PNM goverments.Blaze d Chalice wrote:One of the reasons I will vote pnm, is because pnm people suffer the most under pnm, and I like that.
If pnm start helping their pnm people, I might reconsider.
zoom rader wrote:PNM ppl gained the most under non PNM goverments.Blaze d Chalice wrote:One of the reasons I will vote pnm, is because pnm people suffer the most under pnm, and I like that.
If pnm start helping their pnm people, I might reconsider.
Simple, really. They have been indoctrinated to believe that the other side will always make it worse.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Only 5 seats with an election in Trinidad....36 are predictable even before election....only thing I cant understand is how pnmites tend to suffer more under the pnm and they still continue to vote pnm...
eliteauto wrote:^^^^ sounds exactly like the campaign they ran in Tobago that resulted in a 12-nil defeat.
Continue the narrative of Trinis stupid, not focused on issues etc, it's reflective of a couple things
A) your circle or the people you associate with
B) your personal perspective based on your own biases
C) your choice of following a very narrow political agenda
I'm surprised some tuners on both sides of the political divide really believe that constant repetition of the same narrative is going to impact on the wider electorate. You're all just preaching to the already converted and somehow taking consolation in the affirmation
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], SMc and 204 guests