Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

Cure for cancer?

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
belalegosi
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2401
Joined: August 19th, 2003, 8:53 pm
Location: MN
Contact:

Cure for cancer?

Postby belalegosi » May 16th, 2011, 1:06 am

http://hubpages.com/hub/Scientists_cure ... kes_notice

:|
Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but major pharmaceutical companies are not interested.

Researchers at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Canada have cured cancer last week, yet there is a little ripple in the news or in TV. It is a simple technique using very basic drug. The method employs dichloroacetate, which is currently used to treat metabolic disorders. So, there is no concern of side effects or about their long term effects.

This drug doesn’t require a patent, so anyone can employ it widely and cheaply compared to the costly cancer drugs produced by major pharmaceutical companies.

Canadian scientists tested this dichloroacetate (DCA) on human’s cells; it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells and left the healthy cells alone. It was tested on Rats inflicted with severe tumors; their cells shrank when they were fed with water supplemented with DCA. The drug is widely available and the technique is easy to use, why the major drug companies are not involved? Or the Media interested in this find?

In human bodies there is a natural cancer fighting human cell, the mitochondria, but they need to be triggered to be effective. Scientists used to think that these mitochondria cells were damaged and thus ineffective against cancer. So they used to focus on glycolysis, which is less effective in curing cancer and more wasteful. The drug manufacturers focused on this glycolysis method to fight cancer. This DCA on the other hand doesn’t rely on glycolysis instead on mitochondria; it triggers the mitochondria which in turn fights the cancer cells.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Pharmaceutical companies are not investing in this research because DCA method cannot be patented, without a patent they can’t make money, like they are doing now with their AIDS Patent. Since the pharmaceutical companies won’t develop this, the article says other independent laboratories should start producing this drug and do more research to confirm all the above findings and produce drugs. All the groundwork can be done in collaboration with the Universities, who will be glad to assist in such research and can develop an effective drug for curing cancer.

You can access the original research for this cancer here.

This article wants to raise awareness for this study, hope some independent companies and small startup will pick up this idea and produce these drugs, because the big companies won’t touch it for a long time.


Image

User avatar
~Vēġó~
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 45606
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 12:18 am
Location: Being the Change that I want to See
Contact:

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby ~Vēġó~ » May 16th, 2011, 1:17 am

just so just so....cool!!!!

User avatar
DTAC
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2328
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 1:56 am

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby DTAC » May 16th, 2011, 1:28 am

Well curing something doesn't give pharmaceutical companies a steady stream of income. If they can turn it into a treatment for cancer then they'll be all over it.

User avatar
rollingstock
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17931
Joined: June 29th, 2009, 8:21 am
Location: Ain't got no chill!

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby rollingstock » May 16th, 2011, 1:28 am

Is this for real?

Great news, but didn't expect any better from the pharmaceutical co's

User avatar
Sinister_Audio
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7244
Joined: April 29th, 2004, 5:30 pm
Location: Well not there so....Here?
Contact:

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby Sinister_Audio » May 16th, 2011, 1:34 am

thank god for the one step ahead :)

User avatar
Morpheus
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10741
Joined: July 22nd, 2004, 2:24 am

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby Morpheus » May 16th, 2011, 4:00 am

As far as I have heard(could be rumour of course), is there are cures or simply better treatment for a lot of ailments and diseases. But the good ol pharmaceutical companyies ain't buying that. No pun intended. They would lose millions!

You think funeral homes would be happy if less people died per annum? Food for thought eh.... so sad.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby shogun » May 16th, 2011, 6:42 am

DTAC wrote:Well curing something doesn't give pharmaceutical companies a steady stream of income. If they can turn it into a treatment for cancer then they'll be all over it.


Ent?
Hope this helps show...how concerned these pharmaceutical companies are about our health...those fcuking vultures.

User avatar
TRAE
punchin NOS
Posts: 4390
Joined: December 15th, 2008, 2:47 pm
Location: South!
Contact:

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby TRAE » May 16th, 2011, 9:51 am




Unfortunately this vid is right, because the cost of the drug would be so cheap Pharmaceutical Companies wouldn't want to fund it because they wont be making alot of money off the drug

eekipoo
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 377
Joined: December 6th, 2005, 4:40 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby eekipoo » May 16th, 2011, 4:15 pm

great find

User avatar
ACT DA FOOL
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 376
Joined: July 1st, 2003, 6:37 pm
Location: San Fernando
Contact:

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby ACT DA FOOL » May 16th, 2011, 5:35 pm

Now DIS is sheit to riot for! Not no damn religious beliefs... but for the sake of saving Aunt Jill or Uncle George!!!!

No one wants to see their love ones deteriorate because of Cancer. Saving human lives should be the goal of all these damn cold hearted pharmaceutical bastards; not line their pockets! :@:@

Where Anonymous???? :@

Sigh..

User avatar
bonzo.specb
punchin NOS
Posts: 2970
Joined: October 6th, 2007, 5:43 pm
Location: Civilization
Contact:

Re: Cure for cancer?

Postby bonzo.specb » May 17th, 2011, 12:17 am

Morpheus wrote:As far as I have heard(could be rumour of course), is there are cures or simply better treatment for a lot of ailments and diseases. But the good ol pharmaceutical companies ain't buying that. No pun intended. They would lose millions!

You think funeral homes would be happy if less people died per annum? Food for thought eh.... so sad.

I've heard of the same, and I'd like to believe this as well.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 31 guests