Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
megadoc1 wrote:If you register for this event God is gonna honor it
freedom guaranteed
d spike wrote:brainchild wrote:And you can't say my theory founded on misconceptions because once again, look back at how all these religions (christian ones included) came to be...from one man chaining up enough people to believe his interpretation of the Bible or other religious text or myths. Only difference is i'm not asking anyone pray to anything or to join in at all. I'm simply stating my views and what i think could fix alot of problems.
Ouch. Well put, but heavy on the dark side.
While some will squeal 'semantics', it still remains correct to place concepts in a neutral perspective.
"Religion" is a most abused word - just check any of megadoc's posts that include such a word for reference...
As I have said here before, "religion" really refers to the relationship between the deity and the man. Different people have different concepts of the deity and the form that the relationship should take. We are communal animals, who communicate and share ideas... we tend to form groups with others who share similar thoughts, values, language... thus society, and culture forms.
We share common things, such as language and ideals, why not the form our relationship with God takes? That a society would share a "religion" is natural, and as we attracted others to share our society (bigger groups ensure survival of members) it was a natural progression to encourage others to share our religion.
"Religion", as is used in "organized religion" seems to refer to rites, rituals, priests and rules, but its core concept is still the same.
So when one shuns "religion" publicly, just ensure that others understand exactly what it is that one is shunning. It is easy to appreciate the view of the person who "shuns religion" when one recalls multiple horrible instances in history... but just bear in mind that such happenings took place at the behest of the justification for Man's greed or pride...
d spike wrote:
Allyuh still on dis ting?
Brainchild, forgive this question if you have posted the answer before, but I have stifled far too many a fart in my time, and the compressed gases have affected my reason somewhat... could you just state exactly what your query was?
22 February 2011
New Zealand earthquake: 65 dead in Christchurch
Eyewitness Tania Galbraith: "The whole building began to shake and it just wouldn't stop"
John Key said the toll was expected to rise further, adding: "We may be witnessing New Zealand's darkest day."
The tremor caused widespread damage as it occurred at a shallow depth of 5km (3.1 miles) during lunchtime when Christchurch was at its busiest.
The mayor of New Zealand's second-biggest city says 120 people have been rescued from the ruins.
The country's deadliest natural disaster in 80 years struck at 1251 (2351 GMT on Monday), 10km (6.2 miles) south-east of the city.
Screams from rubble
The damage is said to be far worse than after the 7.1-magnitude quake on 4 September, which left two people seriously injured but no fatalities.
The epicentre of that quake, which occurred in the middle of the night, was further away from the city and deeper underground, but it still caused an estimated $3bn (£1.9bn) in damage.
TV pictures of the aftermath of Tuesday's disaster showed scores of collapsed buildings in the South Island city of nearly 400,000 people.
Shocked survivors could be seen wandering the rubble-strewn streets, which cracked open as the ground beneath was liquefied by the tremor.
Police said that the dead included people on two buses which were crushed by falling buildings.
Helicopters plucked survivors to safety from rooftops, and dumped water on fires.
Officials said up to 30 people were feared still trapped inside the razed Pyne Gould Guinness building, where screams have been heard from the ruins.
"We've had friends in town call us and say there are just bodies lying around: lots of dead bodies outside shops just lying there just covered in bricks”
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ God promised to kill these 65 people last night?22 February 2011
New Zealand earthquake: 65 dead in Christchurch
Eyewitness Tania Galbraith: "The whole building began to shake and it just wouldn't stop"
John Key said the toll was expected to rise further, adding: "We may be witnessing New Zealand's darkest day."
The tremor caused widespread damage as it occurred at a shallow depth of 5km (3.1 miles) during lunchtime when Christchurch was at its busiest.
The mayor of New Zealand's second-biggest city says 120 people have been rescued from the ruins.
The country's deadliest natural disaster in 80 years struck at 1251 (2351 GMT on Monday), 10km (6.2 miles) south-east of the city.
Screams from rubble
The damage is said to be far worse than after the 7.1-magnitude quake on 4 September, which left two people seriously injured but no fatalities.
The epicentre of that quake, which occurred in the middle of the night, was further away from the city and deeper underground, but it still caused an estimated $3bn (£1.9bn) in damage.
TV pictures of the aftermath of Tuesday's disaster showed scores of collapsed buildings in the South Island city of nearly 400,000 people.
Shocked survivors could be seen wandering the rubble-strewn streets, which cracked open as the ground beneath was liquefied by the tremor.
Police said that the dead included people on two buses which were crushed by falling buildings.
Helicopters plucked survivors to safety from rooftops, and dumped water on fires.
Officials said up to 30 people were feared still trapped inside the razed Pyne Gould Guinness building, where screams have been heard from the ruins."We've had friends in town call us and say there are just bodies lying around: lots of dead bodies outside shops just lying there just covered in bricks”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12533291
brainchild wrote:Ahhhh...you my friend are a breath of fresh air in the smog dat has been my conversation with megadoc1 so far.
brainchild wrote: When i speak of religion i'm speaking about the rituals we perform blindly without knowledge of where it originated and most importantly the contempt that SOME of them give birth to towards others.
brainchild wrote:As i stated before i respect all personal beliefs because at the base of it all we are all focused on the same being....the Creator.
brainchild wrote:The difference with me is dat i have chosen not to give my version of the creator all the personality etc dat others have. I seek to appreciate the balance that we have lost our way from and without reading any religious tx a person can look around and see the grand plan.
brainchild wrote:Some may think dat i'm tryin 2 turn them away from their faith or that i'm anti-God....but i'm not, i jus think that we have evolved mentally to the point where we shouldn't require guidance from all these ppl with different interpretations of sumting that's rite in our faces, it only serves as a distraction from wats really goin on.
brainchild wrote:It's easy to say God coming and he'll deal wit those who doing this and that but in the meantime we have kids growing up in a world that being run into the ground and we're not doing wat we should be. The way i see it, how about fixing this life for us and our kids and then think about the afterlife? rather than getting caught up thinking about heaven and everlasting life that may or may not exist and letting our planet go to the dogs.
tekno1 wrote:Here's three simple questions I have for Megadoc. I'm not going back through 200 pages to find out if this was asked.
Do you believe in the big bang theory? No. However, if I did, there is the unanswerable question - "What caused it? I am still waiting on the evolutionists to give me an answer to that one!" The earth is older than the sun, moon and stars. (Genesis 1:10-19)
Do you believe that dinosaurs once roamed the earth before man?No. It is interesting to note that the land animals were created on the 6th. day and man was also created on the 6th. day (Genesis 1:24-31). Dinosaurs existed at the same time as man.
And do you believe in the infallibility of God? Yes. ABSOLUTELY!And does his infallibility negate our free will since he already knows where we will end up? No. It was God's will to give us free choice. But with free choice came clearly outlined consequences.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ God promised to kill these 65 people last night?
Unless we've somehow slipped back into the Old Covenant, nothing that is stated here is biblical. Someone need to explain to Dr. Leslie Rogers the nature of God and the New Covenant.
God is not judging us, ALL the unrighteousness of this ...nation was put on Christ and God Judged it already at the Cross. It is the cornerstone of the Gospel Message. God Loves Sinners.
God Never Judges the the Church with the unrighteous. He Deals with his Church Privately apart from the World, before Judgement comes to the unrighteous.
God would have nothing to gain by bringing destruction to this nation, if the wicked perish, they are lost forever. It would never be God's Will to kill off the wicked in a large natural disaster. There is only one person who would benefit from that, and he's the same one who comes to steal kill and destroy...
Should i go on?
MG Man wrote:
brainchild wrote: while there are those that properly understand the purpose of there religion, for each one there are 20 sheep who jus follow blindly and 10 other sheep whose every deed is performed with the reward at the front of their minds.
brainchild wrote:I may be drawing my own map as i go along but i assure you my path still leads up that mountain.
brainchild wrote:But for me the mountain leads simply to enlightenment...answers to my questions, knowledge...even if there is no reason for us being here, i'd still like to know how we got here.
brainchild wrote:I have no interest in the afterlife if it is wat is stated in religious texts.
d spike wrote:We were put here as a people, to achieve something as a people. (One reason why suicide is wrong.) Life is beautiful, but too short for an individual to achieve God's plan (if there is one) on his own. We each go through life, meeting far too many individuals, to interact fully with each... far too many problems and ills exist for any one of us to deal with - alone. We can run to a "God" for solace, but in every example of this, we are told that the answer lies within us as a people. We are "Christ" to each other - or whatever you want to call it.
We are called as a people to achieve something wonderful, over time (hence the reason for procreation) and this is what was meant for us.
The world isn't going to end in a fit of God's anger and frustration with our inability to do what's right (that would mean the Devil won and God failed, wouldn't it?) but when we succeed in doing our part in the Great Scheme of things/"God's plan".
We were brought into being - whether created in an instant, or brought into creation over a period of time (evolved?), is neither here nor there - as a race that propagates itself, and hands down knowledge across generations. This has to be for a reason. We are meant to achieve something... something good and wonderful... so wonderful, that its achievement will be known to all when it comes about, everyone will be aware of it and its meaning... and the role the Creator played in all time. This is the plan. Its achievement will be the glory of our race, and to the greater glory of him who made us, and gave us the gifts to achieve. (Unfortunately, many people see the end of our time here as cataclysmic - thanks to the apocalyptic idiom used by the Jews - and a sort of 'victory dance' for "us" to do over the defeated "them".)
d spike wrote:
There must be a reason why we are here. The afterlife is for after...
megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ God promised to kill these 65 people last night?
quite the opposite He(God) said that satan comes to steal to kill and destroy
as one of my friends puts it (this was in response to a prophesy of an earthquake due to hit trinidad on thurday morning @6am in which the the prophet claim was a divine earthquake )Unless we've somehow slipped back into the Old Covenant, nothing that is stated here is biblical. Someone need to explain to Dr. Leslie Rogers the nature of God and the New Covenant.
God is not judging us, ALL the unrighteousness of this ...nation was put on Christ and God Judged it already at the Cross. It is the cornerstone of the Gospel Message. God Loves Sinners.
God Never Judges the the Church with the unrighteous. He Deals with his Church Privately apart from the World, before Judgement comes to the unrighteous.
God would have nothing to gain by bringing destruction to this nation, if the wicked perish, they are lost forever. It would never be God's Will to kill off the wicked in a large natural disaster. There is only one person who would benefit from that, and he's the same one who comes to steal kill and destroy...
Should i go on?
brainchild wrote: without reading any religious tx a person can look around and see the grand plan.
brainchild wrote: Several experiences, observations, books, research and other factors have brought me to this conclusion
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ God promised to kill these 65 people last night?
quite the opposite He(God) said that satan comes to steal to kill and destroy
as one of my friends puts it (this was in response to a prophesy of an earthquake due to hit trinidad on thurday morning @6am in which the the prophet claim was a divine earthquake )Unless we've somehow slipped back into the Old Covenant, nothing that is stated here is biblical. Someone need to explain to Dr. Leslie Rogers the nature of God and the New Covenant.
God is not judging us, ALL the unrighteousness of this ...nation was put on Christ and God Judged it already at the Cross. It is the cornerstone of the Gospel Message. God Loves Sinners.
God Never Judges the the Church with the unrighteous. He Deals with his Church Privately apart from the World, before Judgement comes to the unrighteous.
God would have nothing to gain by bringing destruction to this nation, if the wicked perish, they are lost forever. It would never be God's Will to kill off the wicked in a large natural disaster. There is only one person who would benefit from that, and he's the same one who comes to steal kill and destroy...
Should i go on?
so why doesnt God prevent it?
megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:megadoc1 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ God promised to kill these 65 people last night?
quite the opposite He(God) said that satan comes to steal to kill and destroy
as one of my friends puts it (this was in response to a prophesy of an earthquake due to hit trinidad on thurday morning @6am in which the the prophet claim was a divine earthquake )Unless we've somehow slipped back into the Old Covenant, nothing that is stated here is biblical. Someone need to explain to Dr. Leslie Rogers the nature of God and the New Covenant.
God is not judging us, ALL the unrighteousness of this ...nation was put on Christ and God Judged it already at the Cross. It is the cornerstone of the Gospel Message. God Loves Sinners.
God Never Judges the the Church with the unrighteous. He Deals with his Church Privately apart from the World, before Judgement comes to the unrighteous.
God would have nothing to gain by bringing destruction to this nation, if the wicked perish, they are lost forever. It would never be God's Will to kill off the wicked in a large natural disaster. There is only one person who would benefit from that, and he's the same one who comes to steal kill and destroy...
Should i go on?
so why doesnt God prevent it?
unfortunately He gave us the authority to do so
sMASH wrote:werds are a hell ova thing. actions on the other hand...
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Chimera, Google Adsense [Bot] and 30 guests