WTF Did I Just Read?

[stev]

any tuners here ever came across a sentence / word dat u ketch yuh arse to read or understand?

example a word: Pnuemonoultramicroscopicsylicavolcaniconiosis

thats a disease caused by inhaling silica dust


and this paragraph:

"For from the fact that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about every other area, Bett invalidly infers that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about any other area. That is to say, to deny the objectivity of morality, it is not necessary to have confidence in the objectivity of every other way of looking at the world; but it does not follow from this that, to deny the objectivity of morality, one need not be certain about the objectivity of at least one other way of looking at the world."

i still eh know what d hell dat mean.

[rollingstock]

^ not surprising, you can't even spell 'steve'

[Mark!]

If you have read any published scientific articles, you gon ask your self that question at one point or the other.

[cinco]

^ not surprising, you can't even spell 'steve'

[Team Loco]

ever heard of: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

cant even pronounce it

[stev]

^ not surprising, you can't even spell 'steve'

i knew this was gonna be the first comment. i think u beat cinco to it. lol

[eliteauto]

and this paragraph:

"For from the fact that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about every other area, Bett invalidly infers that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about any other area. That is to say, to deny the objectivity of morality, it is not necessary to have confidence in the objectivity of every other way of looking at the world; but it does not follow from this that, to deny the objectivity of morality, one need not be certain about the objectivity of at least one other way of looking at the world."

i still eh know what d hell dat mean.

but the paragraph is, to paraphrase, purportedly a paradox, presumably to design a paradigm in your mind, an alternate alternative (sic) to alter the altar that you brain worships at, you probably lapsed with your synapses. Some might say you have a propensity for density since you left out the "e"

[RBphoto]

Downloaded smells like teen spirit lyrics the first time..... was like WTF is this sheit.

[Rooki3]

^ not surprising, you can't even spell 'steve'

[Redman]

Apparently morality has a politics of it's own.

[uncle sam]

any tuners here ever came across a sentence / word dat u ketch yuh arse to read or understand?

[~Vēġó~]

stev we are often baffled by the syntax and structure used in posts made by many users.....

also why is it that difficult words are used to explain concepts that one is meant to understand.....sometimes the explanation explains nothing at all and just leaves one more confused....

[sliderz1]

skeptical, objectivity, morality,

[Sky]

and this paragraph:

"For from the fact that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about every other area, Bett invalidly infers that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about any other area. That is to say, to deny the objectivity of morality, it is not necessary to have confidence in the objectivity of every other way of looking at the world; but it does not follow from this that, to deny the objectivity of morality, one need not be certain about the objectivity of at least one other way of looking at the world."

i still eh know what d hell dat mean.

but the paragraph is, to paraphrase, purportedly a paradox, presumably to design a paradigm in your mind, an alternate alternative (sic) to alter the altar that you brain worships at, you probably lapsed with your synapses. Some might say you have a propensity for density since you left out the "e"

[brams112]

Allyuh and hinds in the pee on them is family orr,that guy does same some things even his peers does be confused.

[black start]

OP, say it with me now.

S....T....E....V....E.....

Now, all together now

[JoeBama]

Smh.........Fada wat i walk into.....lol

[stev]

OP, say it with me now.

S....T....E....V....E.....

Now, all together now

doh try dat. i think u know my name is not steve, lol

[black start]

OP, say it with me now.

S....T....E....V....E.....

Now, all together now

doh try dat. i think u know my name is not steve, lol

you figure out who i is yet?

[X2]

any tuners here ever came across a sentence / word dat u ketch yuh arse to read or understand?

example a word: Pnuemonoultramicroscopicsylicavolcaniconiosis

thats a disease caused by inhaling silica dust


and this paragraph:

"For from the fact that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about every other area, Bett invalidly infers that, to be skeptical about morality, one need not be non-skeptical about any other area. That is to say, to deny the objectivity of morality, it is not necessary to have confidence in the objectivity of every other way of looking at the world; but it does not follow from this that, to deny the objectivity of morality, one need not be certain about the objectivity of at least one other way of looking at the world."

i still eh know what d hell dat mean.

Well therein lies the problem.... what the writer claims to be fact at the onset of the paragraph, is actually assumption that his/her theory has been proven. On top of that they keep repeating the same theme over and over.... I would thereby postulate that the original author of the paragraph is either an idiot or a politician.

[X2]

oh... and rollingstock tek win eh... just so yuh know.