Bick’s big new plan for Mayaro ...

[Chimera]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

[zoom rader]

zoom you can grease somebody to get stuff approved

I don't think that applies to deeds.

[zoom rader]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

She needs to prove she owns the land via a valid deed. She must have an updated deed since 1901.

Or maybe bricks need to show his deed.

[zoom rader]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

I actually have one of those deeds with minerals rights and it still stands today.

[Chimera]

zoom you can grease somebody to get stuff approved

I don't think that applies to deeds.

yes it does

[16 cycles]

lady make claims there - might need court clothes yes....

[The_Honourable]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

She needs to prove she owns the land via a valid deed. She must have an updated deed since 1901.

Or maybe bricks need to show his deed.

From the video she has the typical deed so is common law lands which is notorious for persons to commit fraud, and Mayaro is a big target these days. If it was RPO, she would have been safe. Then again, it was in court so more than likely her deed or share or entitlement was set aside. I would not even be surprised her own attorney was with the other side.

Hoping the judgement gets posted online on ttlawcourts so we can fully understand what happened.

[zoom rader]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

She needs to prove she owns the land via a valid deed. She must have an updated deed since 1901.

Or maybe bricks need to show his deed.

From the video she has the typical deed so is common law lands which is notorious for persons to commit fraud, and Mayaro is a big target these days. If it was RPO, she would have been safe. Then again, it was in court so more than likely her deed or share or entitlement was set aside. I would not even be surprised her own attorney was with the other side.

Hoping the judgement gets posted online on ttlawcourts so we can fully understand what happened.

As u spoke about lawyers taking both sides. I had a lawyer that tried to play me for the other lawyer. He kept delaying, saying he's getting things done, and it was taking long tying to milk me.

I cut my looses, paid him off, collected my deeds and gave my case to another lawyer who got it done in months.

[SR]

Ask anyone in bamboo about land grabbing going on


When you building cash and have good connections you dont need town and country approvals for wasa and ttec

[zoom rader]

Ask anyone in bamboo about land grabbing going on


When you building cash and have good connections you dont need town and country approvals for wasa and ttec

Deed owned says it all

[ftitan]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

I personally know the family (inlaw family). The documents she has are real, not squatting thing. Alot of people get mess up in that because the land they were to get, gone to Bicks in his bobol court antics. He bribing the right people to get the rights to the land.
She was selling land and subdividing to give to her grandkids long before this man come to seize people thing.

[AlphaMan]

down there might actually be real long time crown deeds too
the kind before they put stuff like no ownership of minerals and water on land etc

if is 1901 she talking about her family occupying from then it hadda be old thing like that

she keep talking about they occupying and working the land from since the beginning and theres plenty of land that has rules behind you having possession

in Carlsen field half of the area if for agriculture, half is for live stock

if you doing live stock on the agri land thats grounds to lose it and vice versa

when state land was regularizing people years ago they were making them sign an agreement with a set of onerous clauses if you wanted your deed, things like if they want back the land they just hadda give you a month notice, if you light bush fire on the land thats ground to lose it, if you rent it to anyone for agriculture/livestock usage thats ground to lose it, if you dont keep it constantly planted/ stocked with animals thats grounds to lose it

i would really like to see her documents and how bicks end up with that land under court judgment

I personally know the family (inlaw family). The documents she has are real, not squatting thing. Alot of people get mess up in that because the land they were to get, gone to Bicks in his bobol court antics. He bribing the right people to get the rights to the land.
She was selling land and subdividing to give to her grandkids long before this man come to seize people thing.

I believe her though...he's a sketchy dude..