Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rovin wrote:so just now i called d ronix tools phone no on fb to find out if they had something in stock, phone rang about 5 times so i say maybe they busy which is understandable & was about to hang up & call back later but guess who answered d phone, d man himself - u must make out his voice. He casually said they na didnt have any so i said no problem, he said okay cool & i hang up ...
j.o.e wrote:Stoick wrote:I think Inshan's detractors usually fall into one of the following groups:
1. Die-hard PNM sycophanst, "PNM till ah dead", supporters, because Inshan does criticize and shame the PNM for all the crap they do.
2. Die-hard UNC sycophant, "UNC till ah dead", supporters, because Inshan does criticize and shame the UNC for all the crap they do.
3. Persons (and/or their associates) who inshan catch on camera driving on shoulder, engaged in corruption, or other crap. Because Inshan shame them real bad on TV, they does troll the forums and call-in programs to make whatever comment they does make.... Me thinks it probably have a good bit of them in this forum.
4. Persons who associated with other media houses, because they damn vex how Inshan show on a Wednesday night alone does get more viewers than their news does get throughout the whole month... That is why when they do any report on him its either negative or indifferent at best.
5. People who islamaphobic.
I fall into the category of people who don’t like people who can’t disagree without being disagreeable. A big hard back man using nicknames and insults instead of calmly getting his point across is childish. People like this who want to usher in a new politics and offering worse sicken me.
Trinidad will never get anywhere if we alienate those we disagree with.
Rovin wrote:na i eh call u, u is no7 ............................. yea i know u joking
K74T wrote:Inshan > PEA
Chimera wrote:It have no dirt.
And people have endlessly tried to bring him down and can't.
No one here could match up the charity he gives personally and through his organisation.
bluefete wrote:Chimera wrote:It have no dirt.
And people have endlessly tried to bring him down and can't.
No one here could match up the charity he gives personally and through his organisation.
Sooo how does he get f/x to send to those terr ermmmmmmm foreign organisations after he collects the donations?
Chimera wrote:bluefete wrote:Chimera wrote:It have no dirt.
And people have endlessly tried to bring him down and can't.
No one here could match up the charity he gives personally and through his organisation.
Sooo how does he get f/x to send to those terr ermmmmmmm foreign organisations after he collects the donations?
Call his show a evening and ask him if its really a important question to you.
Inshan Ishmael demands Cro Cro pay up
VALSAYN businessman Inshan Ishmael wants calypsonian Weston “Cro Cro” Rawlins to pay up.
https://newsday.co.tt/2024/02/19/inshan-ishmael-demands-cro-cro-pay-up/
On February 19, Ishmael’s attorneys wrote to Rawlins’s attorney Kareem Marcelle calling on his client to promptly satisfy the judgment debt against him.
Attorney Andre Cole reminded Marcelle that the court’s award of $250,000 would accrue interest from the date the judgment was delivered on January 29.
“Therefore, to avoid further haemorrhaging of costs and to bring closure to the parties, we believe it would be in the overall best interest of the administration of justice to satisfy the judgment promptly.”
Cole suggested a payment plan to cover the $313,900 total owed by Rawlins to Ishmael. Apart from the court’s award of damages, interest and legal costs, the total includes a previous payment of $17,400 in costs related to Ishmael’s successful injunction application.
The breakdown of payment suggested by Ishmael’s lawyers is $17,400, $250,000 payable to Ishmael and $46,500 payable to Cole.
Ishmael was also represented by attorneys Richard Jaggasar and Nigel Trancuso.
On January 29, Justice Frank Seepersad ruled that Rawlins defamed Ishmael in his 2023 calypso Another Sat is Outside Again.
Ishmael sued Rawlins after video recordings of the former monarch’s performance at a TUCO competition went viral.
He claimed the calypso, performed on February 5, 2023, directly named and defamed him, and his reputation was “100 per cent” damaged by the song. He also complained of a radio interview Rawlins gave in response to the lawsuit.
Although the judge deemed some aspects of the song “fair comment,” Seepersad said there were defamatory portions which were not “satire, picong or clever critique,” but “salacious and derogative.”
“The first defendant and others like him who demonstrate the desire to use calypso to divide and denigrate citizens must be deterred.”
Immediately after Seepersad’s ruling, there were appeals by Rawlins’s supporters seeking donations to assist in the payment of his judgment debt.
Goodmaj. tom wrote:Inshan Ishmael demands Cro Cro pay up
VALSAYN businessman Inshan Ishmael wants calypsonian Weston “Cro Cro” Rawlins to pay up.
https://newsday.co.tt/2024/02/19/inshan-ishmael-demands-cro-cro-pay-up/
On February 19, Ishmael’s attorneys wrote to Rawlins’s attorney Kareem Marcelle calling on his client to promptly satisfy the judgment debt against him.
Attorney Andre Cole reminded Marcelle that the court’s award of $250,000 would accrue interest from the date the judgment was delivered on January 29.
“Therefore, to avoid further haemorrhaging of costs and to bring closure to the parties, we believe it would be in the overall best interest of the administration of justice to satisfy the judgment promptly.”
Cole suggested a payment plan to cover the $313,900 total owed by Rawlins to Ishmael. Apart from the court’s award of damages, interest and legal costs, the total includes a previous payment of $17,400 in costs related to Ishmael’s successful injunction application.
The breakdown of payment suggested by Ishmael’s lawyers is $17,400, $250,000 payable to Ishmael and $46,500 payable to Cole.
Ishmael was also represented by attorneys Richard Jaggasar and Nigel Trancuso.
On January 29, Justice Frank Seepersad ruled that Rawlins defamed Ishmael in his 2023 calypso Another Sat is Outside Again.
Ishmael sued Rawlins after video recordings of the former monarch’s performance at a TUCO competition went viral.
He claimed the calypso, performed on February 5, 2023, directly named and defamed him, and his reputation was “100 per cent” damaged by the song. He also complained of a radio interview Rawlins gave in response to the lawsuit.
Although the judge deemed some aspects of the song “fair comment,” Seepersad said there were defamatory portions which were not “satire, picong or clever critique,” but “salacious and derogative.”
“The first defendant and others like him who demonstrate the desire to use calypso to divide and denigrate citizens must be deterred.”
Immediately after Seepersad’s ruling, there were appeals by Rawlins’s supporters seeking donations to assist in the payment of his judgment debt.
alfa wrote:It's ironic that two decades ago crocro sang a song titled Kidnap Dem, the rational behind the song according to him is that certain politicians took money fron the treasury which could easily be recovered by kidnapping them. And now he might be facing jail time because of not having money to pay so if we take his song at face value I wonder what Inshan should do to recover said funds.
Chimera wrote:alfa wrote:It's ironic that two decades ago crocro sang a song titled Kidnap Dem, the rational behind the song according to him is that certain politicians took money fron the treasury which could easily be recovered by kidnapping them. And now he might be facing jail time because of not having money to pay so if we take his song at face value I wonder what Inshan should do to recover said funds.
Get lawyers and bailiff and court marshals to enforce his judgment and seize cro cros assets.
what you was thinking?
Chimera wrote:100
people need to learn that they can't say anything they want without consequences
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 471 guests