Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/trinidad-and-tobago
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel ... isory.html
Strangely enough the Canadian govt lists home invasions which Habit says doesn't exist, as a crime. But burglaries down so the Canadian govt lying, Kamla fed them wrong info. Also look at the areas they specifically mentioned but Rowley says crime is all over the world.
1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
2) Both the US and CA say that home invasions are common. Where have I said they are not?
You are unable to answer my questions so you have to spin which I know you will question 1 (if you even try to answer it). Then you have to make a strawman argument which is a logical fallacy where you have to misrepresent my words in order to pathetically try to beat it.
You look super insecure and intimidated. Quote me and refute my argument. Putting words in my mouth is a cop out.
Habit7 u are a coward and i am calling u out on this .Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/trinidad-and-tobago
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel ... isory.html
Strangely enough the Canadian govt lists home invasions which Habit says doesn't exist, as a crime. But burglaries down so the Canadian govt lying, Kamla fed them wrong info. Also look at the areas they specifically mentioned but Rowley says crime is all over the world.
1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
2) Both the US and CA say that home invasions are common. Where have I said they are not?
You are unable to answer my questions so you have to spin which I know you will question 1 (if you even try to answer it). Then you have to make a strawman argument which is a logical fallacy where you have to misrepresent my words in order to pathetically try to beat it.
You look super insecure and intimidated. Quote me and refute my argument. Putting words in my mouth is a cop out.
Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/trinidad-and-tobago
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel ... isory.html
Strangely enough the Canadian govt lists home invasions which Habit says doesn't exist, as a crime. But burglaries down so the Canadian govt lying, Kamla fed them wrong info. Also look at the areas they specifically mentioned but Rowley says crime is all over the world.
1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
2) Both the US and CA say that home invasions are common. Where have I said they are not?
You are unable to answer my questions so you have to spin which I know you will question 1 (if you even try to answer it). Then you have to make a strawman argument which is a logical fallacy where you have to misrepresent my words in order to pathetically try to beat it.
You look super insecure and intimidated. Quote me and refute my argument. Putting words in my mouth is a cop out.
Flip flop Habit7pugboy wrote:you said home invasions are an unofficial subset of burglaries and the numbers going down drastically under erla
now you saying they are common ?
why you keep contradicting yourself
stop talking about who super insecure and insulting ppl when you are being shown to be self contradicting
dont shoot the messengersHabit7 wrote:alfa wrote:https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/trinidad-and-tobago
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel ... isory.html
Strangely enough the Canadian govt lists home invasions which Habit says doesn't exist, as a crime. But burglaries down so the Canadian govt lying, Kamla fed them wrong info. Also look at the areas they specifically mentioned but Rowley says crime is all over the world.
1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
2) Both the US and CA say that home invasions are common. Where have I said they are not?
You are unable to answer my questions so you have to spin which I know you will question 1 (if you even try to answer it). Then you have to make a strawman argument which is a logical fallacy where you have to misrepresent my words in order to pathetically try to beat it.
You look super insecure and intimidated. Quote me and refute my argument. Putting words in my mouth is a cop out.
Hes just a *deleted* and talks out of his PNM arsepugboy wrote:habit might say that is more of a burglary grab and run since the home owners weren’t touched or tied up and beaten
alfa wrote:Habit7 wrote:alfa wrote:https://travel.gc.ca/destinations/trinidad-and-tobago
https://travel.state.gov/content/travel ... isory.html
Strangely enough the Canadian govt lists home invasions which Habit says doesn't exist, as a crime. But burglaries down so the Canadian govt lying, Kamla fed them wrong info. Also look at the areas they specifically mentioned but Rowley says crime is all over the world.
1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
2) Both the US and CA say that home invasions are common. Where have I said they are not?
You are unable to answer my questions so you have to spin which I know you will question 1 (if you even try to answer it). Then you have to make a strawman argument which is a logical fallacy where you have to misrepresent my words in order to pathetically try to beat it.
You look super insecure and intimidated. Quote me and refute my argument. Putting words in my mouth is a cop out.
Question 1 was answered previously in another post if you had taken the time to read instead of just randomly posting anything to defend the govt
Not gonna waste my time to retype. The only person is spinning is you as you constantly pull the 'out of context' argument to the ' I refuse to be baited' to shifting the goalpost from
'Rowley only enquired about Warner's FUL' to
'so he asked GG to fast track it but it's not illegal'.
So miss me with your BS.
This is a lie. I never said "the numbers going down drastically under erla"pugboy wrote:you said home invasions are an unofficial subset of burglaries and the numbers going down drastically under erla
now you saying they are common ?
why you keep contradicting yourself
stop talking about who super insecure and insulting ppl when you are being shown to be self contradicting
dont shoot the messengers
He said while the People’s National Movement (PNM) campaigned on Local Government reform, the Opposition who the NTA, according to the Prime Minister, “is now in bed with” wants to bring stand your ground law to the Parliament.
On Monday the UNC announced an accommodation with the NTA to contest the upcoming Local Government Elections.
He said both parties believe that to curb crime they have to militarise the population and added that he had no choice but to believe it was racially skewed.
“If you see somebody you don’t like you shoot them and you tell the police. I was afraid of that person, a child ball bounce into your yard and the mother come behind to follow the child and at the end of the day I am saying it here tonight in St James, if you all don’t believe me, don’t doubt me that is a policy that is simply saying is a dog whistle that they going to give people of a certain race guns to shoot people of another race because they are saying that the crime in this country which we know is across the board is one race attacking another race,” Dr Rowley said.
https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/govt-ap ... a0287ee4a0
mero wrote:If it should be transparent and corruption free to acquire an FUL, why would one race kill out another?
What would qualify one race over another to acquire an FUL legally? Money?
Habit7 wrote:Please do not misrepresent what the man said.
Stand your Ground legislation which would mean you can attack ppl if you feel threatened and not in self defense. Coupled with a liberal FUL policy is what he said would cause a race war. And the example he cited was in states in the US with such legislation and had shootings at that time where innocent Black ppl were shot by White ppl.
So the issue is not FULs, it is Stand your Ground legislation proposed by the UNC.
pugboy wrote:what would one race be doing to be causing the impression that they would end up being killed out
so much so rowlee saying it on tv
mero wrote:pugboy wrote:what would one race be doing to be causing the impression that they would end up being killed out
so much so rowlee saying it on tv
Idk, all races seem to love crime, badness, bloodshed and corruption in this country. Not so? Be specific
alfa wrote:Habit7 wrote:Please do not misrepresent what the man said.
Stand your Ground legislation which would mean you can attack ppl if you feel threatened and not in self defense. Coupled with a liberal FUL policy is what he said would cause a race war. And the example he cited was in states in the US with such legislation and had shootings at that time where innocent Black ppl were shot by White ppl.
So the issue is not FULs, it is Stand your Ground legislation proposed by the UNC.
Have you confirmed that is in fact what the UNC meant with stand your ground or are you just using the US definition of the law?
pugboy wrote:funny thing is according to habit quote above
it is rowlee who start the race talk by saying it is racially skewed
of course habit will deny that rowlee said that too
or claim he said it in a diff context
What's the general consensus on 2nr?alfa wrote:mero wrote:If it should be transparent and corruption free to acquire an FUL, why would one race kill out another?
What would qualify one race over another to acquire an FUL legally? Money?
Is it that only one race has the finances to 'buy ' FULs in order to kill bandits who are primarily from another race? Or are they trying to kill innocent people from another race? Either suggestion is racist.
Fact is people want FULs to protect themselves from bandits of any race
I take offense,mero wrote:pugboy wrote:what would one race be doing to be causing the impression that they would end up being killed out
so much so rowlee saying it on tv
Idk, all races seem to love crime, badness, bloodshed and corruption in this country. Not so? Be specific
alfa wrote:mero wrote:If it should be transparent and corruption free to acquire an FUL, why would one race kill out another?
What would qualify one race over another to acquire an FUL legally? Money?
Is it that only one race has the finances to 'buy ' FULs in order to kill bandits who are primarily from another race? Or are they trying to kill innocent people from another race? Either suggestion is racist.
Fact is people want FULs to protect themselves from bandits of any race
I'll say it simple.... Fyzo popo know exactly where and who these "pest" are
gastly369 wrote:I'll say it simple.... Fyzo popo know exactly where and who these "pest" are
Habit7 wrote: (1) can you cite any law in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago which names home invasion as an offence?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 109 guests