WTK-integra type R vs WRX

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » June 27th, 2008, 10:41 am

Knight1, selective 'facts' :lol:

Alpha_2nr · Postby **Alpha_2nr** » June 27th, 2008, 10:49 am

^^

Postby **tr1ad** » June 27th, 2008, 10:55 am

bushwakka

wha yuh tunnin up yuh pan fuh

bushwakka · Postby **bushwakka** » June 27th, 2008, 11:15 am

tr1ad wrote:bushwakka

wha yuh tunnin up yuh pan fuh

dredd, meh eh tunnin up nun...i was jus confused, cuz i cudn't make sense outta wha u said...das all

Postby **tr1ad** » June 27th, 2008, 11:17 am

doh take on honda hoe

he does jive ah sahbaru

an ah ole model gti does give him pressure

RASC · Postby **RASC** » June 27th, 2008, 11:21 am

mitsu wrote:
A DC5R will outhandle a stock WRX...heck.....with good tyres it could probably outdrive an STi too IMHO....with a good driver too.

That rules out honda hoe..

Allyuh fellas getting a little carried away,WRX built for fast acceleration,
on a 1/4 ,I'll put my $$on the WRX,is a circuit the ITR will win hands down.

ITR is 220 to the crank

WRX is 230

factor in lose of power to 4 wheels plus turbo lag exiting corners and u'll understand why the subaru lost

don't believe it wuz propaganda

These days hoe making sense,,yuh trying to impress somebody ,lol

simple just post up the stock quarter mile times and the story done--->

same year
same region
STOCK

nothing more nothing less

mitsu · Postby **mitsu** » June 27th, 2008, 2:11 pm

^^and who u be?

Sky · Postby **Sky** » June 27th, 2008, 2:21 pm

^^ A man who makin sense. For 5 pages men yappin on about which better and only one man post figures.

15devils · Postby **15devils** » June 27th, 2008, 2:24 pm

^^^^

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » June 27th, 2008, 2:25 pm

mitsu · Postby **mitsu** » June 27th, 2008, 2:28 pm

Well,I dont rely on google ,I see it first hand.

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » June 27th, 2008, 2:37 pm

mitsu wrote:Well,I dont rely on google ,I see it first hand.

so where have u seen 1st hand a wrx beat an ITR in camden/wallerfield?

we want time slips too eh

:roll:

mitsu · Postby **mitsu** » June 27th, 2008, 2:41 pm

^if yuh looking to run a WRX,I'll help yuh find one,lol

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » June 27th, 2008, 2:42 pm

u didn't answer d question :roll:

mitsu · Postby **mitsu** » June 27th, 2008, 2:48 pm

Well,I dont rely on google ,I see it first hand.

I mean't I rather see it first hand!

sr20ve · Postby **sr20ve** » June 27th, 2008, 3:29 pm

depends a 08 WRX can whoop an ITR

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » June 27th, 2008, 3:32 pm

^ can it whoop an '08 ctr?

RASC · Postby **RASC** » June 27th, 2008, 11:38 pm

sr20ve wrote:depends a 08 WRX can whoop an ITR

same year...it would then have to graduate to

'08 WRX vs. '08 CTR

You really wanna put that kinda pain and suffering on the minds of Subaru faithful?

ImprezaDriver · Postby **ImprezaDriver** » June 28th, 2008, 2:00 am

lol @ scivic keepin up with scoobs...

you honda peepos get dumbassier every day

Alpha_2nr · Postby **Alpha_2nr** » June 28th, 2008, 9:27 pm

Iwas kinda expecting that GONE TRUUUU..... mighta come with another " ***vs. WRX " thread by now!

I vote for "VTi civic VS. WRX". :roll:

Or maybe "Yaris vs. WRX"

:lol:

DEVI · Postby **DEVI** » June 29th, 2008, 12:32 am

ok having read all 6 pages of this thread i'll say this...... i have raced stock ITR's on the hiway wth my 1.8 gsr Mirage and beat them on acceleration and top end , though top end was close ..... then a few times i have tried the WRX Subaru on the hiway, had slight acceleration advantage until about 200k then the WRX pulls away time and time again....think this should clear up the straaight line performance.....but i have test driven a stock ITR and i'll say this, not many cars handle as well out of the box including Evo's and Sti's.

Sky · Postby **Sky** » June 29th, 2008, 12:44 am

^^ Cept by Claxton Bay

Alpha_2nr · Postby **Alpha_2nr** » June 29th, 2008, 7:33 am

i have raced stock ITR's on the hiway wth my 1.8 gsr Mirage and beat them on acceleration and top end , though top end was close ..... then a few times i have tried the WRX Subaru on the hiway, had slight acceleration advantage until about 200k then the WRX pulls away time and time again....think this should clear up the straaight line performance

Same thing I've been saying. WRX has an advantage on st. line acceleration.

Speaking of which, did these "highway tests" include a silver WRX? :lol:

GONEEE TRUUUU..... · Postby **GONEEE TRUUUU.....** » June 29th, 2008, 9:57 am

well KNIGHT1, imprezadriver......maybe if the wrx was a better car then we wudnt be comparin it to a hmmmm "honda"....wat u think?? :lol:

Rooki3 · Postby **Rooki3** » January 6th, 2010, 11:50 pm

De Phoq Honda men was this Stupid in 2008

honda hoe · Postby **honda hoe** » January 7th, 2010, 8:30 am

tr1ad whey d swift? :lol:

kai · Postby **kai** » January 7th, 2010, 8:37 am

Rooki3 wrote:De Phoq Honda men was this Stupid in 2008

HONDA power ftw

15devils · Postby **15devils** » January 7th, 2010, 11:17 am

honda grasscutters and power generators ftw

Sky · Postby **Sky** » January 7th, 2010, 2:49 pm

Knight1 wrote:

Other than that, the torque on that thing (DC5R) is pitiful.....165 or so lb ft? Plus you gotta rev like a madman to get that power.

A 2.0 NA GX Impreza makes close to that.....stock WRX does anywhere from 211-215 lb/ft of torque......and as the saying goes, hp is good for magazines, it's torque that wins races

So if tq wins races, why The ITR's 151 beating the WRX's 211?
All allyuh need to book a night to use Spectacular forum wid all dat comedy yes.

all this ole talk. It simple. big @$$ crank for stroke = more tq
small @$$ crank for stroke = less tq but the ability to rev higher.
Honda chose to go with small stroke, small displacement and high revs. Where the problem there?
Allyuh does rip on bikes for swinging to 14k?

halfdef · Postby **halfdef** » January 7th, 2010, 7:44 pm

Forums

WTK-integra type R vs WRX

Who is online