Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
d spike wrote:Here's a story:
The Yanks had built multiple small dams in the hills of Chaguaramas and piped them off to underground cisterns, using this water to supply their base and support communities.
Whenever in the past one of these lines were rediscovered, WASA quietly piped it into their grid. They never bothered to trace these lines, they just accepted these as a ground-water source.
During the dry season, the pressure in the WASA mains would overcome the gravity feed pressure in the hidden cisterns, and water would flow back into the cisterns, then up into the dams (back into the ravines, into the ground... talk about water recycling).
WASA figures that they lose two million gallons a day to these underground systems... and now their quiet policy is to disconnect such lines when they find them - for they have no idea where such connection are, as they have no record of connecting them in the first place...
TK! wrote:d spike wrote:Here's a story:
The Yanks had built multiple small dams in the hills of Chaguaramas and piped them off to underground cisterns, using this water to supply their base and support communities.
Whenever in the past one of these lines were rediscovered, WASA quietly piped it into their grid. They never bothered to trace these lines, they just accepted these as a ground-water source.
During the dry season, the pressure in the WASA mains would overcome the gravity feed pressure in the hidden cisterns, and water would flow back into the cisterns, then up into the dams (back into the ravines, into the ground... talk about water recycling).
WASA figures that they lose two million gallons a day to these underground systems... and now their quiet policy is to disconnect such lines when they find them - for they have no idea where such connection are, as they have no record of connecting them in the first place...
that sound like a load of crock.
if they took that water, it would be on the intake side of the system. ie-before treatment.
the output section of the system (ie - clean water) would not feed back into the intake.
d spike wrote:TK! wrote:
that sound like a load of crock.
if they took that water, it would be on the intake side of the system. ie-before treatment.
the output section of the system (ie - clean water) would not feed back into the intake.
In a perfect world, I would agree with you.
What makes you think that they chlorinate all their water?
There's a lot that goes on in WASA (regarding water and sewage treatment) that they would prefer the public not know about. How is chlorine added to most of our water supply? Do you know?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 67 guests