Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
orangefox wrote:Redman wrote:Even if we have more oil to refine, the demand will be dismissed.
Demand for what?
The output from the refinery is used locally/sold Internationally
about 70% of the output of transportation fuels is consumed locally. which has increased by 16% for in 2014(Jan-October)
Since 2008 to now we have added 200k vehicles (based on the License plates)
How do we dismiss demand?...
The reality is that the GORTT
Loses Taxes
Gains
on the subsidy
on Lower import cost
Lower cost of Equity and local produced crude.
in the normal world lower prices does not 'dismiss demand'
Why do we increase production NOW in a commodity that has
been devalued ? Subsidy is not a revenue earner !
Remove the subsidy and sell the commodity on the international markets ?
Not going to happen in an election year. But AFTER people have to watch out.
"Loses Taxes" ? Not really. Lower yes. Hence cutback in spending by GORTT.
Read Gillette comments very closely. It is pure politics.
There is an answer
Dizzy8 may have the answer![]()
nervewrecker wrote:Skanky wrote:The naivety and ignorance in this thread are nothing short of astounding.
1.On the one hand there is the US,Europe,UK and their allies.On the other China,Russia,N.Korea,Cuba and their allies.Bells ringing yet?
2.The price of oil is not tied to some string that when news emerges it automatically draws the price up or down.It is not tied to supply or demand,shale,OPEC,Saudi or anything else.
When news emerges,or in general, people or programs have to press the buy or sell buttons and whichever side is stronger determines the price of oil.America has the largest traders in the world so it seems price is determined by market forces but it isn't.CNN,BBC,Bloomberg and other 'unbiased' news outlets are from the US,UK and their allies so they tell you what to believe as can be seen from the previous responses in this thread.
Just based on how the price of oil is affecting the world recently you really think the US being the superpower it is would allow itself to be at the mercy of some middle eastern?
3.The attack on the Ruble has been orchestrated by the US seeking to drive the Russian economy to its knees along with the other sanctions.China does not allow it's currency to be freely traded because they know the same could happen to them.China is instead seeking to help their ally by swapping Yuan for Ruble thus trying to stabilize the Russian economy slightly.
4.Cuba longtime allies of Russia and China have now had thawing relations with the US in the US attempting to isolate Russia further.Starting to piece together the puzzle yet?
5.Most likely N.Korea did not hack Sony as disclosed by the honourable and always accurate FBI or CIA.It probably was carried out by the US itself and now the US and N.Korea(possessor of Nuclear weaponry and Russian ally) could attempt to foster some relations by seeking to find the people who hacked Sony and blamed N.Korea.Attempts to isolate Russia again.This is the reason China and NKorea relations have become lukewarm as of recent.
6.Do you think it was coincidence the Chinese VP visit to Trinidad recently was followed by Biden's visit soon after?China is attempting to buy US allies/oil and gas producers from all over the world with gifts of donations such as Trinidad received recently.
Let's hope Trinidad chooses the correct ally and you people finally understand what is going on in the world today wrt oil prices.
Sounds more sensible.
sMASH wrote:I think rasc's assessment is correct. This whole thing is meant to squeeze Russia. The shale gas initiatives would be on pause and overall petroleum industries would not be so badly off, customers in the US would benefit from low prices. Saudi has long been a friend of the US so it explains why they would do that so easily without US retaliation.
Dizzy28 wrote:sMASH wrote:I think rasc's assessment is correct. This whole thing is meant to squeeze Russia. The shale gas initiatives would be on pause and overall petroleum industries would not be so badly off, customers in the US would benefit from low prices. Saudi has long been a friend of the US so it explains why they would do that so easily without US retaliation.
There is no friendship in Business. The Saudis killing three birds with one stone by keeping prices low for now
1. Hurting American Shale Oil business
2. Punishing Russia for the overt support of Al Assad and the Syrian Regime
3. Punishing Iran for:
a. Support of Al Assad and the Syrian Regime
b. Being Shia
c. Development of their Nuclear Programme
The Ruskies and the Persians depend on oil monies the US not really. The Saudis aren't doing anyone but themselves any favours.
The_Honourable wrote:Saw this... thought i would put it here. Some excerpts...
Russian economy attacked through oil prices – Obama
Pushing down global oil prices was part of Washington’s rationale to destabilize the Russian economy, US President Barack Obama said in an interview to National Public Radio, a non-profit media organization.
Oil price key to Russian economy crumbling
Answering a direct question whether it was the US that collapsed oil prices globally to create problems for Russia, Obama said that Russian economy “was already contracting and capital was fleeing even before oil collapsed.”
Obama revealed that it was a “part of our rationale” that the “only thing” keeping Russian economy “afloat” was the price of oil.
Sanctions only made Russian economy more vulnerable to the “inevitable” oil price disruptions. “They'd have enormous difficulty managing it,” Obama said.
The US should be “firm with the Russians” when it comes to issues like Ukraine, but also America must build its manufacturing base to make sure its economy is better than Russia’s.
“Ultimately, the big advantage we have with Russia is we've got a dynamic, vital economy, and they don't. They rely on oil; we rely on oil and iPads and movies and you name it,” Obama said, adding that “making sure that prosperity is broadly shared” is also important for American people to feel confident about the future.
Putin ‘not so smart’ after all – Obama
“You'll recall that three or four months ago, everybody in Washington was convinced that President Putin was a genius... And he had outmaneuvered all of us and he had, you know, bullied and, you know, strategized his way into expanding Russian power,” Obama said.
“We don't want war with Russia,” Obama recalled telling himself at the time. So instead he concentrated on applying “steady pressure” on Moscow.
An international coalition with European partners was formed “to oppose Russia's violation of another country's sovereignty,” Obama said, after the interviewer mentioned the Crimean Peninsula.
After the citizens of Crimea voted overwhelmingly in favor of reuniting with Russia in spring, Moscow quickly organized the region’s reentry into the Russian Federation.
“Over time, this would be a strategic mistake by Russia,” Obama said.
“And today, you know, I'd sense that at least outside of Russia, maybe some people are thinking what Putin did wasn't so smart,” Obama said.
Source: http://rt.com/usa/218731-obama-npr-interview-russia/
orangefox wrote:Trinidad cannot play games. We are not" big boys" as we think.
God is not a Trini
GORTT have already cut back spending $$ in keys areas of development.
At the end of it all the poor man will suffer.
The rich will not.
Dizzy28 wrote:orangefox wrote:Trinidad cannot play games. We are not" big boys" as we think.
God is not a Trini
GORTT have already cut back spending $$ in keys areas of development.
At the end of it all the poor man will suffer.
The rich will not.
Where exactly has money been cut in key areas of development??
So far I have seen them cut the Constituency Fund (thankfully so). That was far from being key.
Haven't seen announcements to cuts in education, health, or nat sec.!!
Dizzy28 wrote:orangefox wrote:Trinidad cannot play games. We are not" big boys" as we think.
God is not a Trini
GORTT have already cut back spending $$ in keys areas of development.
At the end of it all the poor man will suffer.
The rich will not.
Where exactly has money been cut in key areas of development??
So far I have seen them cut the Constituency Fund (thankfully so). That was far from being key.
Haven't seen announcements to cuts in education, health, or nat sec.!!
bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
nervewrecker wrote:bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
where you get this figure?
toyolink wrote:....And the price continues to hit another low.
bluesclues wrote:nervewrecker wrote:bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
where you get this figure?
simple math. a 500% return on every $30 spent means im selling oil for $150 a barrel imv. but then i have a very warped sense of business, economy and mathematics lol
Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:nervewrecker wrote:bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
where you get this figure?
simple math. a 500% return on every $30 spent means im selling oil for $150 a barrel imv. but then i have a very warped sense of business, economy and mathematics lol
smh.
Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:nervewrecker wrote:bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
where you get this figure?
simple math. a 500% return on every $30 spent means im selling oil for $150 a barrel imv. but then i have a very warped sense of business, economy and mathematics lol
smh.
Putin ‘not so smart’ after all – Obama
“You'll recall that three or four months ago, everybody in Washington was convinced that President Putin was a genius... And he had outmaneuvered all of us and he had, you know, bullied and, you know, strategized his way into expanding Russian power,” Obama said.
nervewrecker wrote:Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:nervewrecker wrote:bluesclues wrote:selling oil at $150 a barrel atm. cost $30 a barrel approx. LEL. these expert economists in this country yes. i at this time in my life pity ppl with degrees.
where you get this figure?
simple math. a 500% return on every $30 spent means im selling oil for $150 a barrel imv. but then i have a very warped sense of business, economy and mathematics lol
smh.
X2, I just didn't worry anymore
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Putin ‘not so smart’ after all – Obama
“You'll recall that three or four months ago, everybody in Washington was convinced that President Putin was a genius... And he had outmaneuvered all of us and he had, you know, bullied and, you know, strategized his way into expanding Russian power,” Obama said.
who the fack he fooling?
Putin did outsmart him and still is, Putin is a chess player he has all this covered already.
Just look at every move played out, always 3 steps ahead of Obama.
Obama needs to stop kidding himself into thinking a liberal moron like himself could understand the tactics of the former soviet KGB spy. Putin already knew this was going to happen it don't take a genius to know Obama is pretending to be Ronald Reagen.
The difference is Reagen was a boss and the Russians had respect for him. Putin sees Obama like Martin Joseph, he can't help but laugh when he sees his face and see him making threats.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests