Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
meccalli wrote:The ruach hakodesh is impersonal, a breath or pneuma(wind). Paul brings greetings in his letters in the name of the Father and the Son, Yehoshua. I think he forgot that other being.
In Acts 5:3–4, Peter asks Ananias, “Why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit...? You have not lied to men but to God.” According to Peter’s words, to lie to the Holy Spirit is to lie to God. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 3:16, “Do you not know that you are God’s temple and that God’s Spirit dwells in you?” God’s temple is the place where God himself dwells, which Paul explains by the fact that “God’s Spirit” dwells in it, thus apparently equating God’s Spirit with God himself.
David asks in Psalm 139:7–8, “Whither shall I go from your Spirit? Or whither shall I flee from your presence? If I ascend to heaven, you are there!” This passage attributes the divine characteristic of omnipresence to the Holy Spirit, something that is not true of any of God’s creatures. It seems that David is equating God’s Spirit with God’s presence. To go from God’s Spirit is to go from his presence, but if there is nowhere that David can flee from God’s Spirit, then he knows that wherever he goes he will have to say, “You are there.”
Paul attributes the divine characteristic of omniscience to the Holy Spirit in 1 Corinthians 2:10–11: “For the Spirit searches everything, even the depths of God. For what person knows a man’s thoughts except the spirit of the man which is in him? So also no one comprehends the thoughts of God [Gk., literally “the things of God’] except the Spirit of God.”
Moreover, the activity of giving new birth to everyone who is born again is the work of the Holy Spirit. Jesus said, “unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Do not marvel that I said to you, “You must be born anew”’ (John 3:5–7). But the work of giving new spiritual life to people when
they become Christians is something that only God can do (cf. 1 John 3:9, “born of God”). This passage therefore gives another indication that the Holy Spirit is fully God.
Systematic theology : an introduction to biblical doctrine: Grudem, 2000, p. 237
Habit7 wrote:You cant just find one instance of personification and apply it where ever you want irrespective of context and language.
In fact I can further say that the Holy Spirit is God Acts 5:3-4, Lord 2 Corinthians 3:18 and can be blasphemed Matthew 12:31.Habit7 wrote:The Holy Spirit is eternal Hebrew 9:14, omnipotent Luke 1:35, omnipresent Psalm 139:7-10, will 1 Corinthians 12:11, loves Romans 15:30 and speaks Acts 8:29; 13:2.
Habit7 wrote:and the teachers He has given you which are verified by His word.
meccalli wrote:blues, I don't think a self professed muslim as yourself has any business with explaining biblical theology.
Isaiah 9:6 - For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
What you are saying here contradicts Isaiah 45:5 I am the Lord, and there is no other; besides Me there is no God.meccalli wrote:No, I believe YHVH is Yehoshua's father.(edit-I haven't actually come to a complete conclusion of this as far as names go, but the Father is God, he has a son and shares the same divine nature of his father as the only begotten son).
This is not true. You trust yourself, a man. And if the "Spirit of God" was leading in truth then why you posted a false quotation?meccalli wrote:I stopped trusting in man, and the spirit of God had his way in me teaching truth.
Acts 5:3-4 But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and to keep back some of the price of the land? While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not under your control? Why is it that you have conceived this deed in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.”meccalli wrote:You still haven't shown me where God is the Spirit equates a separate third entity. The spirit of God/ Holy spirit/ ruach hakodesh has no roots in scripture being some other being that exists independently.
Habit7 wrote:What you are saying here contradicts Isaiah 45:5 I am the Lord, and there is no other; besides Me there is no God.
If the Son is just some divine being then is Isaiah wrong?
Habit7 wrote:RBphoto wrote:Habit7 wrote:I cant tell where you begin and where cheap anti-trinitarian webpage ends. The same webpages that falsely quoting a book as I demonstrated before.
God is three persons, each person is fully God, God is one in essence. That is the succinct doctrine of the Trinity found throughout the Bible. Not only in Matt 29:18.
One is one and three make one.
Three in person, one in essence. They are not the same.
RBphoto wrote:Habit7 wrote:RBphoto wrote:Habit7 wrote:I cant tell where you begin and where cheap anti-trinitarian webpage ends. The same webpages that falsely quoting a book as I demonstrated before.
God is three persons, each person is fully God, God is one in essence. That is the succinct doctrine of the Trinity found throughout the Bible. Not only in Matt 29:18.
One is one and three make one.
Three in person, one in essence. They are not the same.
Oh, so they stole the trinity from Hinduism with Bhrama, Vishnu and Shiva being the trinity, different aspects of god when they are needed at different times. And you guys say Hinduism hard to understand. Is the same damn thing.
meccalli wrote:So I don't see the problem in asking God for revelation of his word. Its false to a trinitarian who believes in 3 divinities.
edit-1 Corinthians 8:6
But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
RBphoto wrote:Oh, so they stole the trinity from Hinduism with Bhrama, Vishnu and Shiva being the trinity, different aspects of god when they are needed at different times. And you guys say Hinduism hard to understand. Is the same damn thing.
Habit7 wrote:*bubble burst*Hinduism’s Many Gods
Published: Thursday, September 13, 2012
Sat Maharaj
The 7th Annual Hindu Mandir Executives’ Conference was held in San Jose California, USA on August 17—19, 2012. Out of this conference many Hindu publications have emerged. In one publication Mandir Vani, (The Voice of Hindu Temples,) the message of the Maha Sabha of T&T is published. It reads: “A temple is not a building. It is the abode of the Lord. A temple’s strength is not in the bricks. Its fortitude comes from the dedication of its members. A temple is not held together by plaster and mud. Its glue is the piety and devotion of the community. A temple is not simply a place we visit. It should be the axis around which our lives revolve,” wrote Swami Chidananda Saraswati.
“By coming together and working together to ensure that programmes are implemented within the temples and also between/amongst the temples for the youth, you will bring even greater benefit to all Hindus living in the USA. “Creating an environment where the youth understand, appreciate and love their Hindu culture is a crucial need today, as is uniting all Hindu temples under one umbrella. When we are all united in the name of Sanatan Dharma, we can truly bring the message of peace, harmony and universal brotherhood to the world.”
Many aspects of Hinduism seem to confuse the average westerner who is steeped in the Christian traditions. The conference provided answers to some of these questions and we produce hereunder answers to the perception that there are numerous Gods in Hinduism: “Hindus believe in one Supreme God who created the universe. He is all-pervasive. He created many Gods, highly advanced spiritual beings, to be His helpers.
Contrary to prevailing misconceptions, Hindus all worship a one Supreme Being, though by different names. This is because the peoples of India with different languages and cultures have understood the one God in their own distinct way. Through history there arose four principal Hindu denominations—Saivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism and Smartism. For Saivites, God is Siva. For Shaktas, Goddess Shakti is supreme. For Vaishnavites, Lord Vishnu is God. For Smartas—who see all Deities as reflections of the One God—the choice of Deity is left to the devotee.
This liberal Smarta perspective is well known, but it is not the prevailing Hindu view. Due to this diversity, Hindus are profoundly tolerant of other religions, respecting the fact that each has its own pathway to the one God. One of the unique understandings in Hinduism is that God is not far away, living in a remote heaven, but is inside each and every soul, in the heart and consciousness, waiting to be discovered. This knowing that God is always with us gives us hope and courage. Knowing the One Great God in this intimate and experiential way is the goal of Hindus spiritually.
Hinduism is both monotheistic and henotheistic. Hindus were never polytheistic, in the sense that there are many equal Gods. Henotheism (literally “one God”) better defines the Hindu view. It means the worship of one God without denying the existence of other Gods.
We Hindus believe in the one all-pervasive God who energises the entire universe. We can see Him in the light shining out of the eyes of humans and all creatures. This view of God as existing in and giving life to all things is called panentheism. It is different from pantheism, which is the belief that God is the natural universe and nothing more.
It is also different from strict theism which says God is only above the world, apart and transcendent. Panentheism is an all-encompassing concept. It says that God is both in the world and beyond it, both immanent and transcendent. That is the highest Hindu view.
Hindus also believe in many Gods who perform various functions, like executives in a large corporation. These should not be confused with the Supreme God. These Divinities are highly advanced beings who have specific duties and powers—not unlike the heavenly spirits, overlords or archangels revered in other faiths. Each denomination worships the Supreme God and its own pantheon of divine beings.
What is sometimes confusing to non-Hindus is that Hindus of various sects may call the one God by many different names, according to their denomination or regional tradition. Truth for the Hindu has many names, but that does not make for many truths. Hinduism gives us the freedom to approach God in our own way, encouraging a multiplicity of paths, not asking for conformity to just one.
There is much confusion about this subject, even among Hindus. Learn the right terms and the subtle differences in them, and you can explain the profound ways Hindus look at divinity. Others will be delighted with the richness of the Indian concepts of God.
You may wish to mention that some Hindus believe only in the formless Absolute Reality as God. Others believe in God as personal Lord and Creator. This freedom makes the understanding of God in Hinduism, the oldest living religion, the richest in all of earth’s existing faiths.”
Satnarayan Maharaj
Secretary General
Sanatan Dharma Maha Sabha
http://www.guardian.co.tt/columnist/201 ... -many-gods
Uncle Sat explains it well![]()
But henotheism is still irreconcilable with:Habit7 wrote:Isaiah 45:5 "I am the LORD, and there is no other; Besides Me there is no God"
Can a Hindu say the Bible is right when it says this?
meccalli wrote:John 20:17
Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not;
Yeah because if you expound on them you will just repeat your heresy. Those scriptures are consistent with Trinitarian doctrine that within the Godhead their is a hierarchy. However, for you Jesus has to be some other deity which contradicts Isaiah 45:5.meccalli wrote:John 20:17
Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
1 Corinthians 11:3
But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
The scriptures are there and they are bold and plain, there's no need to expound upon them. I haven't resorted to any commentary, just pure scripture.
Habit7 wrote:
To state that the Father is God and the Son is another divine being is heresy (Isaiah 45:5)
To state that the Holy Spirit is not God but a force or wind is heresy (2 Corinthians 3:18)
Isaiah 45 International Standard Version (ISV)
Cyrus: God’s Deliverer
45 This is what the Lord says to his anointed, Cyrus,
whose right hand I have grasped
to subdue nations before him,
as I strip kings of their armor,[a]
to open doors[b] before him
and gates that cannot keep closed:
2 “I myself will go before you,
and he[c] will make the mountains[d] level;
I’ll shatter bronze doors
and cut through iron bars.
3 I’ll give you concealed treasures[e]
and riches hidden in secret places,
so that you’ll know that it is I, the Lord,
the God of Israel, who calls you by name.
4 For the sake of Jacob my servant,
Israel[f] my chosen,
I’ve called you,
and he has established you with a name,[g]
although you have not acknowledged me.
5 I am the Lord, and there is no other besides me:
and there are no gods.[h]
17 Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Lord’s Spirit is, there is freedom. 18 As all of us reflect the glory of the Lord with unveiled faces, we are becoming more like him with ever-increasing glory by the Lord’s Spirit.
meccalli wrote:Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God
You are contradicting Scripture.meccalli wrote:It's clearly seen that Yehoshua admires his father, considers himself not equal to him unlike satan who sought to take his throne through pride.
Yes. If God exalts anything thing else it would be an idol, inconsistent with His word.meccalli wrote:God exalted God?
Habit7 wrote:You are contradicting Scripture.
John 5:18
For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God.
bluesclues wrote:look at it. Alexander the Great(Cyrus) conquered Egypt and was of the Greeks. He conquered africa, the middleeast and asia. look what God has to say about him.
God will Bless Cyrus
13 “I have aroused him[v] in righteousness,
and I’ll make all his pathways smooth.
It is he who will rebuild my city
and set my exiles free,
but not for a price nor reward, ”
says the Lord of the Heavenly Armies.
14 This is what the Lord says:
“The wealth of Egypt, and the merchandise of Ethiopia,
those[w] Sabeans, men of great heights.[x]
They’ll come over to you and will be yours;
They’ll trudge behind you—
coming over in chains, they’ll bow down to you.
They’ll plead with you,
‘Surely God is in you;
and there is no other God at all.’”
See God has claimed responsibility for Cyrus the Great conquest over egypt. the greeks were conquered later with their polytheistic method of ascribing the image of God, almost parallel with the Egyptians whom Cyrus was also a student of Aristotle. when the romans conquered the greeks and formed the greco-roman empire, polytheism was still used to describe the One invisible God who led Cyrus. who also is the God of Egypt. are you seeing what going on here? None of the polytheist "Gods" are God. only concepts used to describe attributes of God and personified. when people start to believe any of those from statues to individuals were God himself is when they became pagan. The prophets of course would not make this error. they knew what was being taught. but what was being understood by the people was subject to change by individual interpretations.
The romans carried on polytheism by transcribing the Gods to Heavenly bodies(planets in our solar system and astrology) as an extension of Egypt's SUN GOD RA. because "Heaven" is used to mean 2 things. The word Heaven is primarily the Spiritual plane. but is also used symbolically to refer to the sky and beyond into space. The teachings of egypt nor Greeks was lost. it was incorporated. re-interpreted. described from another perspective to avoid misleading interpretation. the whole nature of being classed as a pagan is when people stop Obeying God's word. when people start making the choice to support evil selfishly ignoring God they become pagan. because their interpretation led them to do the wrong thing. The rituals associated with sacrificing to the Gods are all also symbolic. The whole theme of sacrifice from animals to fasting is about sacrificing sin, or guilty pleasures. to make the choice to resist temptation to things that stagnate spiritual growth. always seeking growth and expansion to become aware of the Spirit. These ritual symbols only symbolize what we are really supposed to do. innocence was sacrificed(virgins, babies) in early primitive cultures because innocence is the only valid offering to God. The message that is carried in the ritual is more important than performing the ritual. again.. demonstrating how people can become pagan. by perform rituals without devotion to God it is to perform them IN VAIN. THE DEVOTION to God is MORE IMPORTANT than performing the ritual.
"Rend your hearts and not your garment". serving God isnt about being the best dressed in church. Worshiping God in fancy clothes makes no difference to him from worshiping him naked. performing the ritual of tearing your garment to show despair when not truly feeling despair is pagan/Vain/fallacy. if your heart not with it then you not performing the ritual as a proper service. which singles out 'Heart' as the most important aspect of worshiping and serving God. and if you serving God with Heart/full devotion.. then even the ritual becomes unecessary. which is the goal. the rituals are used for teaching a viewpoint. the rituals do not actually serve God. you serve God with you Body, Mind and Soul. that is, through your actions, your choices and your devotion to God in everyday living. not just when you go to church.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: The_Honourable and 75 guests