Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Damn brah, I have not heard this much anal talk about man rectum since that last HON match where I carry 45-1 with Berzerker.
You doh study my rectum nah, my cacahole safe. You study that Raging Bull cause he coming your way and he diving deep and hard with that Umbrella.
pjfred wrote:EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ Damn brah, I have not heard this much anal talk about man rectum since that last HON match where I carry 45-1 with Berzerker.
You doh study my rectum nah, my cacahole safe. You study that Raging Bull cause he coming your way and he diving deep and hard with that Umbrella.
Hope that umbrella not centre soft and longer than 9". I love to horn these fools. They dont know how it does feel to .....
EmilioA wrote:Innovative solutions
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/ ... GI20151019
Cars will be banned from central Oslo by 2019 to help reduce pollution, local politicians said on Monday, in what they said would be the first comprehensive and permanent ban for a European capital.
The newly elected city council, made up of the Labor Party, the Greens and the Socialist Left, said the plans would benefit all citizens despite shopowners' fears they will hurt business.
"We want to have a car-free center," Lan Marie Nguyen Berg, lead negotiator for the Green Party in Oslo, told reporters.
"We want to make it better for pedestrians, cyclists. It will be better for shops and everyone."
Under the plans, the council will build at least 60 kilometers of bicycle lanes by 2019, the date of the next municipal elections, and provide a "massive boost" of investment in public transport.
Buses and trams will continue to serve the city center, and arrangements will be found for cars carrying disabled people and vehicles transporting goods to stores, the three parties said in a joint declaration.
Oslo city council will hold consultations, study the experiences of other cities and conduct trial runs, the parties said.
Several European capitals have previously introduced temporary car bans in their city centers, including Paris last month. Some such as London or Madrid have congestion charges to limit car traffic.
Oslo has around 600,000 inhabitants and almost 350,000 cars in the whole city. Most car owners live outside the city center but within Oslo's boundaries.
bluesclues wrote:
china did this to clear smog. trinidad eh have no smog. we have traffic. something that could solve with efficient roadways.
Firstly, unlike Norway, Trinidad is hot and humid. People are not willing to walk 1-2km or peddle 3-5km and arrive dripping wet with sweat.EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:
china did this to clear smog. trinidad eh have no smog. we have traffic. something that could solve with efficient roadways.
But if you ban cars then you have no traffic ! Simple.Its also worth noting that Singapore limits to number of car owners to about 12% of the population. You have to bid for the right to own a car and that right expires after 10 years.
But seriously I wonder how polluted our air is. We already have one of the highest amounts of CO2 per capita in the world. God only knows else is in our air. In fact my Canadian relatives often say that our air smells of Gasoline.
Habit7 wrote:Firstly, unlike Norway, Trinidad is hot and humid. People are not willing to walk 1-2km or peddle 3-5km and arrive dripping wet with sweat.
Secondly Singapore is a little bigger than the size of Tunapuna/Piarco Region and is crammed full of 5 million ppl. They have subways, LRTs and buses. A car is truly optional there.
EmilioA wrote:bluesclues wrote:
china did this to clear smog. trinidad eh have no smog. we have traffic. something that could solve with efficient roadways.
But if you ban cars then you have no traffic ! Simple.Its also worth noting that Singapore limits to number of car owners to about 12% of the population. You have to bid for the right to own a car and that right expires after 10 years.
But seriously I wonder how polluted our air is. We already have one of the highest amounts of CO2 per capita in the world. God only knows else is in our air. In fact my Canadian relatives often say that our air smells of Gasoline.
bluesclues wrote:EmilioA wrote:But seriously I wonder how polluted our air is. We already have one of the highest amounts of CO2 per capita in the world. God only knows else is in our air. In fact my Canadian relatives often say that our air smells of Gasoline.
we in this case are literally a drop in the bucket pollutionwise. we're too small to be considered a significant contributor. per capita is a statistic obased on relative size of the population. our population is small. we just have to fi we roads.
EmilioA wrote:I go repeat me self
Who talking about walking ? Once you build the RR , ban or limit cars.
Daran wrote:I said it once and I go say it again.
Frequent service, fixed scheduled and routes shuttles can solve 90% of our traffic problems.
Yea and f*ck walking or cycling, I go get too black
Habit7 wrote:EmilioA wrote:I go repeat me self
Who talking about walking ? Once you build the RR , ban or limit cars.
I don't know if you read the reuters article you posted prior, but it suggests banning cars with the alternative being walking and cycling. The RR doesn't drop you in front of your office you know?
Numb3r4 wrote:Next some one mentioned the rapid rail but you do know that it will have to stop at a hub/centralized location and you would still have to get from the hub to your job. Now you could use a bicycle but where would you store it with out the fear of it being stolen?, would your job have showering facilities?, would you even be willing to travel with it on the rapid rail?
Again are we ready for this culture change when it comes to mass travel and commuting?
We have problems using PTSC (let alone maintain it) we want to use rail and bike to work?
Daran wrote:Bluesclues,
You're right again. Our situation is unique and after seeing so many internal studies at UWI, a frequent service shuttle system (including a school bus system) can virtually solve almost all of our traffic woes.
bluesclues wrote:
real pie in the sky ideas. the major flaw, is that ppl only looking to countries solutions to implement here, when we have a unique culture and country that needs its own unique solutions. .
Numb3r4 wrote:Next some one mentioned the rapid rail but you do know that it will have to stop at a hub/centralized location and you would still have to get from the hub to your job. Now you could use a bicycle but where would you store it with out the fear of it being stolen?, would your job have showering facilities?, would you even be willing to travel with it on the rapid rail?
Again are we ready for this culture change when it comes to mass travel and commuting?
We have problems using PTSC (let alone maintain it) we want to use rail and bike to work?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Snyper and 28 guests