Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Curtms wrote:Pics of daughter
EmilioA wrote:Query . If the retreat was held in a next location , the tax payers wouldn't still be paying ? In fact wouldnt the tax payers then have to pay the cost of transporting the minsters from this other location to the wedding and back ?
Mark! wrote:ROAD TRIP! COME LEWWE GO!!
FUNERAL, WEDDIN, FUNERAL,WEDDIN,FUNERAL,WEDDIN
matix wrote:The wedding was fantastic. Spending time with Marlene was the highlight of my weekend. Love a full figured woman.
EmilioA wrote:Query . If the retreat was held in a next location , the tax payers wouldn't still be paying ? In fact wouldnt the tax payers then have to pay the cost of transporting the minsters from this other location to the wedding and back ?
brams112 wrote:EmilioA wrote:Query . If the retreat was held in a next location , the tax payers wouldn't still be paying ? In fact wouldnt the tax payers then have to pay the cost of transporting the minsters from this other location to the wedding and back ?
Ur got a point dey fari,transport would have cost millions.
De Dragon wrote:brams112 wrote:EmilioA wrote:Query . If the retreat was held in a next location , the tax payers wouldn't still be paying ? In fact wouldnt the tax payers then have to pay the cost of transporting the minsters from this other location to the wedding and back ?
Ur got a point dey fari,transport would have cost millions.
Cuz Paramount or Sammy woulda have to transport Marlene and Camille alone.
INDAVID WORKSHOP wrote:
Ronaldo95163 wrote:yummy
brams112 wrote:EmilioA wrote:Query . If the retreat was held in a next location , the tax payers wouldn't still be paying ? In fact wouldnt the tax payers then have to pay the cost of transporting the minsters from this other location to the wedding and back ?
Ur got a point dey fari,transport would have cost millions.
daas wrote:daughter could get it
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 15 guests