Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

All Things US Politics Related: Biden pardons Hunter

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 3:28 pm

moving wrote:no clue what yall watching.. but fb has riots posted all over the place


Did those riots happen after he became President?

In any event all those riots are about to stop soon, Trump will be cutting the money going to those states that support sanctuary cities, the idea is that the politicians in these states will now have to go to the people in those states for money to support these SJWs living on welfare and vandalizing the cities during their riots. When residents have to hand over twice the amount of money in tax that they currently pay to support these people the voters will vote out these corrupt politicians. Well this is the theory anyways.

The DNC and the UNC are both Pro welfare socialist, the GOP and the PNM are Not.

User avatar
pete
3NE 2NR Moderator
Posts: 9836
Joined: April 18th, 2003, 1:19 pm
Location: Cruisin around in da GTi
Contact:

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby pete » January 20th, 2017, 3:36 pm

PNM not pro welfare socialist?

lol

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 3:41 pm

pete wrote:PNM not pro welfare socialist?

lol


Compared to the UNC yeah. Remember all the things like Baby Grant, laptops, pushing GATE into vocational etc?

The PNM has ended most of it and is now no longer giving any tom dick and harry the GATE you have to qualify for it and cutting GATE for people over 50 years old. All of these things were long overdue because it was largely a political move by Kamla to gain support.

Rowley is however Way less welfare and socialist than Patrick Manning, the current PNM is the least socialist/welfare political party Trinidad has ever had. Its pretty much the Republican party of Trinidad and Tobago

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10466
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby The_Honourable » January 20th, 2017, 4:07 pm

Dem liberal protesters harden... the control by riot police is entertaining.

User avatar
Miktay
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2088
Joined: July 30th, 2013, 1:13 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby Miktay » January 20th, 2017, 4:08 pm

EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:
pete wrote:PNM not pro welfare socialist?

lol


Compared to the UNC yeah. Remember all the things like Baby Grant, laptops, pushing GATE into vocational etc?

The PNM has ended most of it and is now no longer giving any tom dick and harry the GATE you have to qualify for it and cutting GATE for people over 50 years old. All of these things were long overdue because it was largely a political move by Kamla to gain support.

Rowley is however Way less welfare and socialist than Patrick Manning, the current PNM is the least socialist/welfare political party Trinidad has ever had. Its pretty much the Republican party of Trinidad and Tobago


Both parties are pro-Welfare/Statist/Big Gubbament cronies.

The only difference iz who benefits from the largess of the treasury.

Kamala had her supporters and financiers. So does Rowley.

User avatar
Deadric
Street 2NR
Posts: 37
Joined: January 20th, 2015, 1:23 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby Deadric » January 20th, 2017, 7:20 pm

Billy boy...


User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 7:42 pm

Any reason why Liberals are burning government property and shouting black lives matter?

What does that accomplish? except putting an extra burden on tax payers to replace and repair all these things? I could understand the right to peaceful protest but why destroy property....

redmanjp
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17655
Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:01 pm
Contact:

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby redmanjp » January 20th, 2017, 8:20 pm

Deadric wrote:Billy boy...



and check Hillary reaction

redmanjp
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17655
Joined: September 22nd, 2009, 11:01 pm
Contact:

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby redmanjp » January 20th, 2017, 8:21 pm

EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:Any reason why Liberals are burning government property and shouting black lives matter?

What does that accomplish? except putting an extra burden on tax payers to replace and repair all these things? I could understand the right to peaceful protest but why destroy property....


george soros paying them

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby sMASH » January 20th, 2017, 8:46 pm

Everyone who are upset and acting out against trump, just remember, they could have had Bernie.

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 9:00 pm

Aah yes the peaceful tolerant liberal Anti Trump Rioters set someone's limousine on fire while 217 are arrested. Look at the video how they are shattering windows in shops with baseball bats etc

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news ... er-9660568

Fortunately Trump will put an end to this when he cuts the welfare they will have to be working for a living and won't have time to engage in destroying government or private property. The theory of George Soros paying these lunatics isn't too far fetched aswell.

Image

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 9:19 pm

Anti Trump liberal democrat rioters vandalize Bank of America and Starbucks because they are butt hurt that Trump won.

Not gonna lie this is hilarious and disturbing at the same time.

This looks more like terrorism than a protest.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... spartandhp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFe980lrJDw


User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 20th, 2017, 9:54 pm

Where MR SHOGUN???

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news ... ck-9663213

One airline even changed the mood lighting to pink in honour of the marching women on board.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image








Image

User avatar
DTAC
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2328
Joined: October 15th, 2008, 1:56 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby DTAC » January 20th, 2017, 10:26 pm

Just makes me even happier Trump won. They just butt hurt that the liberal pendulum swung as far as it was going to go and is now swinging back.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby sMASH » January 20th, 2017, 10:34 pm

Hypocrites, the lot.

User avatar
Miktay
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2088
Joined: July 30th, 2013, 1:13 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby Miktay » January 20th, 2017, 11:31 pm

Ivanka...mmmmmmmm

Image

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby shogun » January 20th, 2017, 11:43 pm

DTAC wrote:Just makes me even happier Trump won. They just butt hurt that the liberal pendulum swung as far as it was going to go and is now swinging back.


Lmao.

Trumps approval was at 37% (historically low) and his rating dove 6 points in the last couple weeks (mostly due to appointment pics, drain the swamp backtrack and his tweets and transition fiascos) Obama's rating is at 55%. Not sure what pendulum you're referring to buddy

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby shogun » January 20th, 2017, 11:44 pm

sMASH wrote:Hypocrites, the lot.


Oh the irony...

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby shogun » January 20th, 2017, 11:47 pm

Miktay wrote:Ivanka...mmmmmmmm

Image


Yup, she looks like a first daughter there.... I give her that

S_2NR
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13305
Joined: May 22nd, 2010, 8:11 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby S_2NR » January 20th, 2017, 11:48 pm

redmanjp wrote:
Deadric wrote:Billy boy...



and check Hillary reaction


you cant teach an old dog new tricks :lol:

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 21st, 2017, 2:09 am


User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3448
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Re: RE: Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby teems1 » January 21st, 2017, 7:18 am

shogun wrote:
DTAC wrote:Just makes me even happier Trump won. They just butt hurt that the liberal pendulum swung as far as it was going to go and is now swinging back.


Lmao.

Trumps approval was at 37% (historically low) and his rating dove 6 points in the last couple weeks (mostly due to appointment pics, drain the swamp backtrack and his tweets and transition fiascos) Obama's rating is at 55%. Not sure what pendulum you're referring to buddy

I'm not a Trump supporter by any stretch but if one thing you can ignore for the next 4 years would be any sort of poll numbers.

The election has showed that they are wildly inaccurate when related to Trump.

User avatar
Miktay
Shifting into 6th
Posts: 2088
Joined: July 30th, 2013, 1:13 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby Miktay » January 21st, 2017, 7:27 am

Progressive socialist mainstream media goes ballistic on Trump inauguration. Smh...

They're gonna need alotta prescription meds to handle the next four years.

Trump’s Speech Gave Us America the Ugly. Don’t Let It Become Prophesy.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/20 ... -ugly.html

Trump is setting up the government in a way that promises chaos

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/trump-is ... ntary.html

Trump Lays Down His Law
In a terrifying speech, the new president made clear that freedom and justice are not his concern.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... fying.html

Trump is setting up the government in a way that promises chaos

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/20/trump-is ... ntary.html

Trump’s Grim View of the Economy Ignores Most Americans’ Reality

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/us/p ... pe=article

New York Reactions to Trump Inauguration: Fear and Prayer

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/nyre ... pe=article

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby sMASH » January 21st, 2017, 7:38 am

the only reason why the polls are misleading are because they aren't done in an attempt to accurately show how the populace feels. they are done in a manner to show the result they want to happen.
because of psychology, people tend to go with the crowd. so the fence sitters will side with the more popular side.

so, by saying that hillary will win, and showing numbers in her favor, it would put doubts in the bold people wanting to vote for bernie. when they couple it with stories showing him as less established, they will want to go the sure route.

that is why there are so many memes about people doing something different from the crowd as being in the vast minority.


a way they polls were made to be skewed, is that they didnt ask persons whom they wanted to win, they asked them whom they think would win. its a small difference but it doesn't ask the person to say if all were equal, whom they would like to win, but it establishes a mind set that it doesnt matter who u want to win if they win, just who would most likely win.
like u know ur side will not be able to make it, and u have already predicted the more logical winner.

User avatar
EFFECTIC DESIGNS
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 9651
Joined: April 1st, 2010, 3:17 pm

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby EFFECTIC DESIGNS » January 21st, 2017, 10:26 am

HAHAHAHAHA :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17908
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby De Dragon » January 21st, 2017, 10:30 am

They shoulda send for Clown "they haven't rioted yet" Impsbert................

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: RE: Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby shogun » January 21st, 2017, 2:00 pm

teems1 wrote:The election has showed that they are wildly inaccurate when related to Trump.


Not really.

Trump won by slim margins in states that Democrats usually have on lock (the rust belt) His highest margin was by 10, 000 votes in one of the rust belt states. Your diagnosis that anyone was "wildly inaccurate" is wildly inaccurate. Polls usually fall within a margin of error. So the fact that they got the direction of the Democrat firewall states wrong, was the reason for the shock by pollsters/media. Trump didn't win by any landslide and has no mandate. His win was due to marginal numbers in key Democratic states, while maintaining Republican (Red) states.... all over the rest of the country Hillary racked up 3 million more actual individual votes.

I just hope this thread doesn't get deleted. When the backtracking comes, this will be be proof of who stood where.

User avatar
teems1
punchin NOS
Posts: 3448
Joined: March 15th, 2007, 4:44 pm

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby teems1 » January 21st, 2017, 2:35 pm

shogun wrote:
teems1 wrote:The election has showed that they are wildly inaccurate when related to Trump.


Not really.

Trump won by slim margins in states that Democrats usually have on lock (the rust belt) His highest margin was by 10, 000 votes in one of the rust belt states. Your diagnosis that anyone was "wildly inaccurate" is wildly inaccurate. Polls usually fall within a margin of error. So the fact that they got the direction of the Democrat firewall states wrong, was the reason for the shock by pollsters/media. Trump didn't win by any landslide and has no mandate. His win was due to marginal numbers in key Democratic states, while maintaining Republican (Red) states.... all over the rest of the country Hillary racked up 3 million more actual individual votes.

I just hope this thread doesn't get deleted. When the backtracking comes, this will be be proof of who stood where.

Election night started with a 98% chance for HRC to win.

And this was from the NYT.

Almost being 100% wrong isn't catering for a margin of error.

User avatar
shogun
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 14252
Joined: May 6th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Location: Gone Rogue.

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby shogun » January 21st, 2017, 7:04 pm

Actually, it was an 85% chance, based on their STATE WIDE polls. Those states being primarily the states I mentioned. Those would include usually Democratic leaning Rust Belt states. The national polls weren't far off. Not sure where you got those figures of 100% off. That's laughable. Read from the horses mouth


"All of these states have something in common: They have a large number of white voters without a college degree. Mr. Trump also outperformed the polls in other mostly white and rural states, whether Alaska, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri or Indiana.

The states with a large number of white working-class voters tend to be somewhat less populous than the more diverse and well-educated states along the coasts. A result is that the state polling averages were off by more than usual, even though the national numbers weren’t far off."

"Over all, the national polls missed the result by only a few points: Hillary Clinton is on track to win the popular vote by around 1.5 percentage points, not especially far from her roughly four-point lead in an average of national polls."

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... .html?_r=0



Scalpers Having A Hard Time Moving Trump Inauguration Tickets

:lol:

http://www.askmen.com/news/power_money/ ... ckets.html

User avatar
De Dragon
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 17908
Joined: January 27th, 2004, 3:49 am
Location: Enjoying my little miracles............

Re: US Presidential Election 2016

Postby De Dragon » January 22nd, 2017, 11:34 am

Trump's Press Secretary bitching about how overhead shots showing areas of white where floor protectors were used for the first time to make it seem that the crowd was sparse. Also that the additional metal detectors caused delays to the crowd gaining access to the Mall. Both were fact checked and proven to be wrong! Floor protectors were used previously, and were taken in Obama's inauguration pics. Also Secret Service says only additional checkpoints were set up, NOT metal detectors.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], pugboy, redmanjp, Syberfraggle and 104 guests