Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
aR&D wrote:I am trilled just as the next Tuner on here, however there are somethings that are puzzling me as to the location of proposed site stemming from the pictures of the site and general vicinity and address directions:
The directions/address, Freeport, Heading East Along Todds and coupled with that second picture of the "pink" warehouse after the fork in the road. This area looks very VERY similar to a large acreage of land that was up for residential sale development. The "pink" building stands out to me rather distinctively.
Using the "pink" warehouse as an orientation point, the proposed site is to the WEST (before fork in road and pink building) and adjacent (left side across the road) to it (pink building). If in fact this is the proposed site then something is very amiss here, because to my information and documentation i have - cadastral drawing/map - that land is already bought out for residential development.
This is based on the address and like i said, that distinctive fork in the road and "pink" building on the incline. I am subject to correction.
Notorious Scullman wrote:Good News!aR&D wrote:I am trilled just as the next Tuner on here, however there are somethings that are puzzling me as to the location of proposed site stemming from the pictures of the site and general vicinity and address directions:
The directions/address, Freeport, Heading East Along Todds and coupled with that second picture of the "pink" warehouse after the fork in the road. This area looks very VERY similar to a large acreage of land that was up for residential sale development. The "pink" building stands out to me rather distinctively.
Using the "pink" warehouse as an orientation point, the proposed site is to the WEST (before fork in road and pink building) and adjacent (left side across the road) to it (pink building). If in fact this is the proposed site then something is very amiss here, because to my information and documentation i have - cadastral drawing/map - that land is already bought out for residential development.
This is based on the address and like i said, that distinctive fork in the road and "pink" building on the incline. I am subject to correction.
d00d, the colour PINK, or "pink" as you refer to it is in fact an actual colour. I think all would agree that the building to which you refer as "pink" is actually pink in colour.
Please feel free to omit the quotation marks in future for whatever reason they were "used"
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests