Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:nobody every actually defends the tiefing
the response is usually to sling mud back and say "but allyuh tief too"
pugboy wrote:nobody every actually defends the tiefing
the response is usually to sling mud back and say "but allyuh tief too"
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:wing wrote:Thanks for the clarification. BTW, that's racist.De Dragon wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Wow. Ok cool.
No need to make it racist, if ppl don't like the man talk about the sheit he doing.
I don't agree with the implicit racial profiling name calling either.
And I mean the man have so much other good nicknames we could use (some of which are his own words) - Rottweiler, Sh!tkicker, Growlers, Raging Bull
Didn’t even know what the acronym meant till today. Smh. Man uses every opportunity to use it too.Dizzy28 wrote:You don't wanna knowwing wrote:What does JUHN Scarfy mean exactly? It's Rowley of course, but what's a JUHN?wing wrote:What does JUHN Scarfy mean exactly? It's Rowley of course, but what's a JUHN?
What I mean is Jumped Up House Negro.
I respectfully disagree. I have my reasons for using that term. I also respectfully submit that you don't know me, or anything about me, or my relation or opinions and feelings toward Afro-Trini people, so take your time with your knee jerk, ignorant accusations.
You refer to the mans race, in a pejorative way, repeatedly over a protracted period of time...you invite these comments.
What we all know is what your posts contain and that is more than enough-and like everyone here- you will be judged based on that.
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth. – Oscar Wilde
Redman wrote:Evaluate in this context....simply that dotish people will treat assess, judge,measure,by what you post.
Dais all.
[/b]No need for such a tirade...especially when youve already spent so much time posting about not caring about what people think....smh.
De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Evaluate in this context....simply that dotish people will treat assess, judge,measure,by what you post.
Dais all.
[/b]No need for such a tirade...especially when youve already spent so much time posting about not caring about what people think....smh.
*Fixed*
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Redman wrote:Evaluate in this context....simply that dotish people will treat assess, judge,measure,by what you post.
Dais all.
[/b]No need for such a tirade...especially when youve already spent so much time posting about not caring about what people think....smh.
*Fixed*
And yet here you are doing the same-evaluating the post and reacting.
Redman wrote:If the tree full of cherries ..you cherry pick.
Dave wrote:Wasn't it doomed to fail from the beginning?
That's why he was demoted a few months agoThe_Honourable wrote:So wait... faris botch the case and now his own state witness suing the state!?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
The only lawyer to never win a case ....Trinidad's worst AG in historyThe_Honourable wrote:So wait... faris botch the case and now his own state witness suing the state!?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
bluefete wrote:PAPAYO!!!!
Anand discharged on corruption charges
Rickie Ramdass Oct 10, 2022 Updated 3 min ago
CORRUPTION charges against former attorney general Anand Ramlogan, SC, and attorney Gerald Ramdeen have been discontinued by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).
DPP Roger Gaspard, SC, on Monday afternoon indicated this position of the State before Chief Magistrate Maria Busby-Earle-Caddle when Ramlogan and Ramdeen made a virtual reappearance before her.
While under section 190 of the Constitution the DPP was not mandated to give reasons for the discontinuation of any prosecution by his office, he did so nonetheless during today’s hearing.
The main reason given was the unwillingness of King’s Counsel Vincent Nelson to testify against the men at this time.
Gaspard explained he was informed by Nelson’s attorney in London that even though Nelson had the intention of eventually giving evidence, he was not willing to do so until a civil claim he had against the Office of the Attorney General was completed at the High Court.
The claim concerns him wanting damages for breach of indemnity by the AG’s Office.
Gaspard pointed out the State has no power to compel Nelson to testify, nor can it have him extradited from England.
In those circumstances, the DPP said he has taken the decision to discontinue the matters.
However, he pointed out the State was retaining the option to have the charges reinstated when the civil claim comes to an end.
Ramlogan and Ramdeen were alleged to have taken part in a legal fees kickback scheme with Nelson while Ramlogan was attorney general.
Ramlogan was accused of receiving payment from Nelson after the AG’s Office awarded him a number of State briefs.
Ramdeen was alleged to have facilitated the alleged payments from Nelson to Ramdeen.
https://trinidadexpress.com/newsextra/a ... BMRK-P-CUs
“To make matters worse, Nelson’s lawyer was none other than ex-member of the Police Service Commission, Roger Kawalsingh, who was himself under police investigation in connection with the strange purchase of Al-Rawi’s luxury Porsche Cayenne which was never transferred. Kawalsingh was also the fortunate recipient of over $10M in legal fees for work under the PNM.”
Rowley must answer
Persad-Bissessar called on the DPP to make public the civil lawsuit that Nelson filed against Al-Rawi.
She said several questions now arise:
• Was the indemnity agreement a clever disguise or illicit vehicle for the payment of monies to induce Nelson to fabricate evidence against Ramlogan and Ramdeen?
• Why did Al-Rawi enter into a secret indemnity agreement with Nelson without the knowledge, participation and consent of the DPP?
• Did Rowley, as Prime Minister and/or the Cabinet, approve the terms of this scandalous indemnity agreement?
In before PNM defends hefty legal fees and finds some way to blame Kamla for thisThe_Honourable wrote:If Anand and Ramdeen carry the state to Court, and knowing their track record especially Anand, more than likely they will win.
And you're right, taxpayers footing the bill. This going all the way to the Privy Council for sure.
Well now we know why Keith Scotland went into politics certainly wasn't to talk about bicycles and coal pots. The people keep voting these lawyers into power who know exactly how to work the systemwing wrote:Look how easy the feeble minded are distracted by lawyers seeing about themselves. Was there any doubt about the outcome? Every single one of the players will come out with a nice chunk of change at taxpayers expense. It's what they do.....all of them, that's why so many go into politics, they're predisposed to corruption. Another L for the country.
Basically this. Big boy lawyers doing big boy lawyer business. Corrupt mfers who can circumvent, exhaust and twist the law for their "innocence".wing wrote:Look how easy the feeble minded are distracted by lawyers seeing about themselves. Was there any doubt about the outcome? Every single one of the players will come out with a nice chunk of change at taxpayers expense. It's what they do.....all of them, that's why so many go into politics, they're predisposed to corruption. Another L for the country.
Didn't PNM lawyers eat a food from this as well?mero wrote:Basically this. Big boy lawyers doing big boy lawyer business. Corrupt mfers who can circumvent, exhaust and twist the law for their "innocence".wing wrote:Look how easy the feeble minded are distracted by lawyers seeing about themselves. Was there any doubt about the outcome? Every single one of the players will come out with a nice chunk of change at taxpayers expense. It's what they do.....all of them, that's why so many go into politics, they're predisposed to corruption. Another L for the country.
Imagine UNC supports happy thinking "they" won.
Country rotten to the core yes
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests